Rant

486 readers
1 users here now

A place where you can rant to your heart's content.

Rules :
  1. Follow all of Lemmy code of conduct.
  2. Be respectful to others, even if they're the subject of your rant. Realize that you can be angry at someone without denigrating them.
  3. Keep it on Topic. Memes about ranting are allowed for now, but will be banned if they start to become more prevalent than actual rants.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/40709622

Getting burnt by repair-hostile makers of washing machines who refuse to share documentation inspired this form letter (in LaTeX):

\documentclass[DIV=16]{scrlttr2}

%\LoadLetterOption{NF}              % uncomment for French standard windowed envelope
%\LoadLetterOption{DIN}             % uncomment for German standard windowed envelope
%\LoadLetterOption{UScommercial9DW} % uncomment for US standard double-windowed envelope

\usepackage{ragged2e} % needed to restore the loss of paragraph indents when \raggedright is used
\usepackage{hyperref}

\setlength{\RaggedRightParindent}{\parindent} % restore the loss of paragraph indents when \raggedright is used
\RaggedRight

\newcommand{\appliance}{washing machine} % replace with whatever you need to buy
\newcommand{\mfr}{Machine Maker} % replace with Whirlpool, or whatever
\newcommand{\mfrAddress}{123 sesame street\\90210} % replace with mfr address

\begin{letter}{%
  \mfr\\
  \mfrAddress}

  \opening{Dear \mfr,}

I am in the market for a \appliance.
When I asked the local retailer (whose profession is to sell your products)
which \mfr\ models include service manuals, they were helpless.
Could not find a single machine that respects consumers and thus their right to repair.
Zero. Every product by \mfr\ in their showroom was anti-consumer.

There are no service manuals published on your website either. 
When looking at various second-hand models, many basic user guides were missing as well,
apparently depending on the age of the unit.

I will not buy a disposable anti-consumer \appliance.
Those are for stupid consumers.
A \emph{\bfseries good} \appliance\ meets this criteria:

  \begin{enumerate}
  \item has a \emph{good} service manual which is available to anyone, free of charge
  \item has no cloud-dependency (\emph{all} functionality accessible without Internet)
  \item has no app, OR has a \emph{good} app
  \end{enumerate}

  A \emph{good} app satisfies this criteria:
  \begin{itemize}
  \item open source
  \item requires no patronisation of Google or Apple to obtain
  \item has an APK file directly on your website or on f-droid.org
  \end{itemize}

  A \emph{good} service manual meets this criteria:
  \begin{itemize}
  \item wiring diagram
  \item parts diagram with part numbers
  \item inventory of components including the manuafacturers and models, and functional resistence ranges (Ω)
  \item error codes and their meanings
  \item steps to reach diagnostic mode and steps to use it
  \end{itemize}

Do you make any \emph{good} pro-consumer \appliance s with a good service manual, with no bad apps?
If yes, please send me the service manual and I will take your product seriously.
If not, you are sure to lose the competition.
If everyone else loses the competition as well, then I will continue washing my clothes by hand
-- perhaps with this repairable machine: \url{www.thewashingmachineproject.org}.


  \closing{Sincerely,}
\end{letter}

I suggest sending that letter to every manufacturer making machines for your region. It will get no results but it will send the message they don’t hear enough of.

2
3
6
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by activistPnk@slrpnk.net to c/rant
 
 

I noticed two communities where centralised concentration of power is antithetical to the purpose and topic of the community, despite side-bar promotion of the imperial Cloudflare empire:
https://slrpnk.net/post/25302329
https://slrpnk.net/post/25302230

background triviaThat was 2 posts. An asshole comes along and says “Shut up and stop spamming everywhere”. I don’t give a shit about the naïve dick move to call posts “spam” (which people now understand to mean any ideas that a person dislikes), but to say that two posts (without cross-posts) are “everywhere” as their thesis is a Trump-ian¹ lie. Ignorance exists and so do assholes -- often simultaneously in one person who slings lies. We have to accept that and it’s not what this rant is about. That’s just the background. Dicks will be dicks.

The first voter bias

The problem that emerges is a 2nd asshole kid comes along and up-votes the first asshole without doing a quick and simple check of the facts (whether the msg was sent all over the place). Then the next up-voter thinks: the post got up-voted, so it’s probably true that it was sent all over the place. So they cast their up-vote because there is another up-vote (or simply because they are just like the 1st asshole). And in little time, you have ½ dozen up-votes from people who assume other up-votes signal that the lie must have been verified by someone. So the up-votes influenced by other votes pile on and make the voice of a fool louder than the more civil discourse -- And we have garbage floating to the top.

It’s the same with down votes. If the first voter down votes, the 2nd voter is pulled in that direction. They think if someone votes to suppress, there must be something wrong with the msg so before they even start reading the bias already has inertia. It only takes 1 or 2 downvotes before some readers lose interest in even entering the thread. I know this because I have the same tendency myself, as I am managing my time and I don’t have time for garbage and have to make snap auto-pilot decisions.

Remedy to 1st voter bias

Lemmy servers can be configured to wholly disallow down votes. Some wise admins like that of beehaw (and a few others²) are aware of the problems under the status quo, so they disable down votes. It’s crude but it’s the best result with the blunt tools we have.

It could have a smarter implementation. E.g. The first ~6 or so down-votes could be hidden and only revealed all at once after 7th is cast. Or revealed sooner, one at a time only to offset up-votes.

The bias of demographics

The philosophy of decentralisation drove early engineers to focus on the nuts and bolts of implementing federated networks. The optimism of the Lemmy experiment drove the idea that if hosters simply have ability to control which nodes they federate with, a power balance will sort itself out. It was deployed without the foresight that network effect is still in play because countless users don’t have the insight, principles, or discpline required to do their part in maintaining balance. Fair enough, but it’s a design defect to neglect human factors.

We now have a massive flood of Internet newcomers registering on Lemmy.World like another Facebook, without philosophical insight. Comparable to AOL users in the 1990s. The same lack of insight that eludes them on why concentrated power is a bad idea culminates with their loyalty toward their choice of centralised fiefdoms. So they bring a flood of down votes onto anything putting a negative light on their fiefdom. It’s not just loyalty to their fiefdom. This demographic brings with it a mentality that does not value digital rights in general apart from very basic concepts of speech suppression. The nuances of the anti-big tech culture, digital sovereignty, self determinism and autonomy are lost. This demographic brings votes that do not reflect the principles of the locals.

And votes have consequences. It’s not just an unmerited ego tool. Threadiverse votes have a suppressive effect meant for suppressing actual garbage.

For this reason, Lemmy.World votes on a slrpnk.net thread have relevance to other loyal patrons of Lemmy.World but to locals they just bring distortion. The example shows this clearly, where an anarchist community actually appears to be favoring centralised power contrary to an anarchist code of conduct that rightfully condemns it. From there, I’m not exactly proposing a fix for that aspect, just raising the issue in a rant.

¹ I made up the term “Trump-ian lie”, as it’s inspired by the variety of extreme exaggeration that the orange man routinely conveys despite being superficially instantly detected for what it is.
² va11halla.bar, discover.deltanauten.de, lemmy.casasnow.noho.st, links.nadia.moe, hexbear.net, crazypeople.online, lemminielettrici.it, level-up.zone, lemmy.thefloatinglab.world, lemmy.mods4ever.com, redlemmy.com, pridehaven.social, lem.ph3j.com, chachara.club, lemmy.snoot.tube, linux.community, nsfwaiclub.com, lemmy.balamb.fr, lt.harding.dev, lemmy.blahaj.zone, wolf3d.space, lemmy.curiana.net, discuss.hadan.social, libretechni.ca, beehaw.org, timeperiods.fr

4
 
 

I've been seeing a bunch of video ads on Facebook of games that are similar to Tetris. I find them mesmerizing and oddly satisfying to watch. But when I tried downloading a few of these games, they are nothing like what was shown in the ad.

I just don't get why game developers do this. You went to the trouble of making a program to do a certain thing so you could create an ad to trick people into downloading a completely different program. Why not just create the game you figure people want to play? If you're able to create the program to show in the ad, why not make that the game?

5
 
 

I caught one of those motherfuckers who needlessly park shared e-scooters in bicycle racks. He seemed to be taking a picture of his sabotage of the space cyclists need to lock their bicycle to.

Why is this plague of Google-boot-licking shared e-scooter people attacking our bicycle racks (I have been wondering)?

There are laws banning those scooters from blocking sidewalks and doorways. I assume the e-scooter company would get the fine for illegal parking, which they would need to pass on. So (I’m guessing) users photograph their parking job for self-defense from a fine. Is that correct?

Are they just keeping a personal copy of those photos, or does the app require users to transmit the photos? If they are being transmitted, does that mean the e-scooter companies are complicit in a limited resource (bicycle racks) getting clusterfucked?

What is the recourse for individual action? Ideas:

  • stack the scooters in a pile in the bushes whenever the racks are fully packed by shared scooters.
  • put stickers with a red prohibited sign over a scooter on the racks. But of course the problem with that is that it’s fair enough if a personal scooter is locked to a rack. And also unlocked/shared bicycles are the same problem. What is a graphical symbol that represents shared micromobiles but not personal ones? We could list them out (Lime, Bolt, Dott, Volt, etc) but there are too many and they keep changing. Would an e-scooter with a wi-fi symbol be clear?
  • lock the shared vehicles to the racks where they sit. It’s sacraficial, but sends a msg that costs them money (thus a msg that will not be ignored). Not cheap for the activist.
  • pile the shared machines together and lock them together, perhaps using the built-in lock from one of the shared e-bikes.
6
 
 

There’s a search engine called Kagi and I’ve noticed Lemmy users trying to verbify it by using ‘kagis’ like people use ‘googles’ to mean they used a search engine to try to find some information.

Just stop. It’s dumb. Just say ‘I searched the Internet’ or something. ‘Kagis’ is not going to catch on. It’s not going to be a thing and it doesn’t need to be.

7
 
 

There.
I said it.
68 years old and that's it. That's all I got.

8
-5
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by eecobb to c/rant
 
 

Look, I know there's all kinds of drama going on, especially after the YouTube livestream etc, but this woman is so cool:

  • she's a helicopter pilot, and a really good one. Landing a helicopter on a boat? That's gotta be tricky stuff.
  • she speaks four languages.
  • CEO of a environmental ocean protection nonprofit.

She's super educated, of course; Oxford, preparatory schools, the works. All high marks. Brilliant girl. Computer programmer since her teens, in what, the seventies? Brilliant.
Her dad died suddenly, which really must've affected her, and she always suspected he'd been murdered. She overcame anorexia as a girl; one of eight kids.
She dumped a Count, was friends with a prince, but despite being basically royalty, she chooses to protect the oceans and teach (and fly her helicopter!).

So, when this woman is being compared to the devil, when they're saying she's harvesting blood from children – they actually believe that – when she's getting doxxed, when court proceedings were illegally taped by cultists who believed she was a witch with literal magic powers, I just think we should recognize what a rad Lady she is. It takes guts to go through all that.
So, when the régime kidnapped her, it's no surprise that they're torturing her— lights on all the time, being kept awake in a tiny room, given a number instead of a name... terrible.

Anyway, everyone seems to be against her, but she's actually a really strong, smart, resilient girlboss.

9
38
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/rant
 
 

For the third time since I've lived here in a moderately sized city in the UK, I've seen a black male argue with white trash. I don't know why or how they keep managing to find these "people" and end up arguing with them, and I'd be remiss if I wasn't aware that the pale ones are likely to have found him and started it. The first was a friend of my neighbour and after their heated debate he just swore "Ni****s!" (I abhor censorship but in this particular case I'll let it slide, lest this entire rant be censored). Knowing how systemic oppression of the ethnic majority is ignored or censored, and I see nobody standing up for the victim, that sent me into a fury. Well, today was the third event with the same dark-skinned dude. He had just stopped following this heavily tanned piece of trash that was spewing weird shit. ""Not like us", no, we're nothing like you!" ... "That's why we're going to Mars and you ain't!" My maggot in Christ none of us are, not even the trillionaires. What are you jacked up on.

I know there is a growing issue with even members of the public who support cruelty, practice bigotry and oppose liberty, and the density of assholes in my area may be, and have been, higher than I know. I am at a disadvantage when it comes to seeing just how broken our community is, because I'm basic white. But I want to fight this. I refuse to lay back while the very people I share oxygen with are actively damaging others' lives. How fucking dare the cruel, the unjust and the greedy exist anywhere they please.

My country's leaders have just imprisoned another liberation activist under the guise of terrorism with zero evidence. Small, frequent signs that the land I occupy is becoming more hostile to humanity, to life. Intentionally causing harm to the existence of an innocent being goes against my moral code, and it sure as fuck is more important than laws manipulated by those in power.

Justice for Palestine. Free Mangione. Fuck fascists. BIPOC and LGBTQ+ lives matter.

10
12
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by themeatbridge@lemmy.world to c/rant
 
 

I know everybody is probably sick of hearing that the lotto is a tax on people who are bad at math, but it's far more deceptive than just a complicated expected value equation. Powerball and Mega Millions advertising the sum total of a thirty year annuity as the value of the jackpot is simply a lie. It is false. No, the Powerball is not $248 million dollars. That's literally not what the value of the jackpot is worth.

Advertisements are prohibited from being deceptive because people are gullible. If you were selling jars of tomato sauce, and when people opened them up, they find a bunch of tomato seeds, that would be less of a lie than the current promotion for lotto tickets. You wouldn't be able to say "well, everyone knows that the jars don't have the sauce yet. Eventually, the tomatoes will grow and you can make sauce with them, or we can plant them for you and send you a few tablespoons of sauce every year." You'd be laughed out of court and right into jail, because that's fraud.

You could still have the lotto without the fraud. It would still be a tax on people bad at math. $70 million dollars is functionally equivalent to $248 million, in that it's enough money to change your life forever. People could still purchase the dream of a better life for $2 each, and most of the same people still would because gambling is an addiction. You could be completely honest about how unfair the game is, and people would still happily play.

And that's what bugs me about it. It's so unnecessary. No other casino or gambling establishment could get away with something so transparently dishonest, and they don't have to while still making money hand over fist.

11
 
 

A couple years ago, I decided to switch phone carriers. While looking at the plans, they offered various models of new phone for new members including an iPhone SE. Up until then, I've only owned the flagship Android phones that came "free" with other phone carries upgrade plans, so the fact that I could own an iPhone for around the same price was very enticing to me.

Yes, I've heard about Apple charging people a premium for basic things that they removed (adopter to use the headphone jack, charging brick etc) or Apple introducing "revolutionary" features that Android had had for years, but I wanted to try it out for myself and see if I like it. Form my own opinions, ya know?

But now, it's safe to say that Apple's exclusivity has been getting on my nerves lately.

I hate not being able to download APKs, I hate the fact that I have a lightning charging cable, with Android, I could use any cable I had lying around because it was either USB-C and micro USB. I hate that I have such little customization! IOS recently came out with "widgets" but they still follow the distinct Apple layout. I could download something off the Playstore and it could change the entire layout of the phone! This leads me to next gripe with iOS; the App Store is so limited. On iOS only approved apps are allowed on the App Store. I know that this is a good thing because it means that every app is less likely to contain malware, but having anyone being able to create and upload app was kinda cool. Don't like YouTube's or Spotify's current layout or ads? There's a Vanced version of the apps for that. Do you enjoying using browser extensions? Well, Firefox allows you to add them and use them on the mobile app. The list goes on.

Apple gives decent support for their hardware, so I'll be stuck with this phone for a bit. But I know for sure that my next phone will be Android and I'll keep it that way.

12
 
 

A player on Big Brother said that both her parents ran track and so she was "literally born on the track". Unless your mother went into labour on the track and gave birth right there, you were not literally born on the track!

13
7
Cookie hell (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 10 months ago by Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/rant
 
 

I can't believe I had to deal with this! I just opened an article in Firefox on my Android, and the damn site bombarded me with a staggering 912 cookies! 912! And of course, I was forced to accept whatever they call "essential" cookies, or suffer through the nightmare of toggling each one off individually. But here’s the worst part—they weren't even organized! No, they were scattered everywhere, forcing me to scroll endlessly through this mountain of cookies just to find the few I actually wanted to disable. It’s infuriating! How can anyone tolerate this level of intrusive, irresponsible design? This is an outright invasion of privacy, and it’s sickening!

PS. Apparently I'm not usually angry enough so I used https://goblin.tools/Formalizer to make it more ranty. Completely my experience, angrified.

14
 
 

Digi is a new ISP who recently drilled into façades of people’s homes without notice or consent. Anyone registered with BIPT as a telecom operator does not need consent for the act of attaching their cable to the façade, but they are required to inform home owners before the work and obtain consent on the way that they run the cable.

Digi simply showed up unannounced with workers in plain clothes who drilled into façades spontaneously. Digi also neglected to say anything about it after the fact.

Proximus and Digi both neglected to give advance notice when they did this. Proximus at least left a letter in mailboxes stating what happened and offered free installation of service.

Both Proximus and Digi are also exclusive services. That is, they do not accept cash payments and thus exclude unbanked people (~3% of the population). It’s extra evil on the part of Proximus because they have physical shops all over which obligates cash acceptance and could serve that purpose.

There is in fact no law obligating Belgian telecom operators to offer service to those whose properties involuntarily host their cables. They can be as exclusive as they want.

And worse, home owners who renovate their façade have a legal obligation to send bPost registered letters to each and every cable owner who uses their façade -- currently a hit of €10 per letter. So if there are 7 cables attached, you are effectively legally obligated to spend €70 to give advance notice before working on your own façade.

Does it have to be this way?

No, because they can run their fiber under the sidewalk. They choose to uglify people’s façades to save money. As such, the law effectively strips the people of their bargaining power. In principle, the ISPs should need to entice consumers with a deal that passes some of the savings of using façades onto them. If you have a strip of terraced houses and one house does not take the deal, then it’s not a problem. The sidewalk just needs to be dug up for the house that refuses the offer.

If you look around, sometimes you will see a terraced house that has buried the cables, perhaps because they want a nice looking façade.

This could even be fixed going forward. In principle, every sidewalk will eventually be dug up again, by Vivaqua doing what Vivaqua does. Such moments would be a good opportunity for telecoms to move their cables under the sidewalk, coordinated with whoever digs up the sidewalk for other purposes. Thereafter, homeowners would not have to send 7+ registered letters every time they need to renovate their façades. But our rights and that opportunity has been squandered.

15
 
 

Front-desk receptionists installed in the buildings of gov agencies, news offices, and large companies sometimes have (or act like they have) a strict protocol of tasks that they can or cannot do. If I ask them to page/call relevant staff for something, or to sign for a delivery, they answer to the effect of:

“That is not in my job description…”

or

“Nope, not on my list… I have no scripted process or procedure for that…”

Some receptionists will say “do you have an appointment?”, to which I answer “if an appointment is needed, please make one for me”. They can never handle that. They say call or email, which of course excludes¹ people.

It’s increasingly more common for the outsourced security receptionist to be dumbed down to know nothing about the org they are keeping a gate for, to have no visibility on schedules and no ability to page people. These “people” typically have no capability beyond writing a call center phone number or URL on a post-it note.

I have to wonder, if these unskilled people are going to be so stripped of basic capability, unable to cater for the needs presented in a situation, why even have them? They are good candidates to be replaced by robots, or even just a sign-posting with a QR code on it².

It’s in everyone’s interest for that threat to be looming, and for such receptionists to come to realise that their own job security relies on being customer oriented (not their boss as a customer, but the ultimate customer, who won’t give a shit if a robot replaces a human that acts just like a robot anyway).

Consider the insideous #forcedBanking dimension to this. Making the front desk helpless enables the org/agency to essentially maintain a non-physical presence, which they use as an rationale for refusing cash payments. The outsourced recepionist can be passed off as someone who does not represent the org/agency and thus cannot handle cash payments.

¹ Calling excludes people because call centers have a limit number of languages they can handle, and even if you’re lucky enough to get someone with a compatible language, you lose the possibility of body language, a bad quality signal makes rough language rougher, and if one side gets tired of speaking a non-native language it’s easy enough to just hang up. Calling also is not free. And email is also exclusive

² (in fact I’ve seen it happen.. a gov office receptionist got replaced with a QR code pointing to a dysfunctional website)

Call to action

Maybe print this rant on a flyer that starts with “Dear receptionist…” and keep a copy when you approach a front desk. If they turn out to be a human acting like a bot, give them the flyer. Suggest they read it and share it with their boss.

16
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/38191434

High-level EU courts apparently assume all those who read their acronym-littered opinions and judgements are Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) who already know what the acronyms stand for.

I’m not a lawyer but this seems sloppy from a legal standpoint because an acronym that is never expanded is ambiguous. It creates room for confusion and misinterpretation in the worst case, and in the very least wastes the reader’s time on investigation.

Have lawyers and judges not been trained on this? As a technologist, my training included the good practice of expanding every single acronym the first time it appears, as I did above with “SME”, as well as the extra diligent but optional practice of including a section at the end with all expansions.

I realise that the whole legal industry is made up of mostly tech illiterates. Geeks have the advantage of being able to use LaTeX with the acro package¹, which enables us to write acronyms without thinking about where it first appears because the software automatically expands the first occurrances (or as we specify). Legal workers have probably limited themselves to dumbed down tools like MS Word which probably does not automate this, but nonetheless it’s the writer’s duty to see that acronym expansion happens.

Abbreviations:

SME: Subject Matter Expert

¹ In LaTeX, the preamble would have \DeclareAcronym{sme}{short=SME, long=Subject Matter Expert} and throughout the document each instance would be written as \ac{sme}.

17
 
 
18
 
 

It’s worth watching; interesting.. insightful. But it’s very disturbing that they concealed the most important fact: how she was caught.

Most printers secretly print a concealed unique code (typically a serial number) on every printed page using small faint yellow dots. The naked eye overlooks them but under magnification they can be seen. Reality Winner printed the classified document from a shared office printer. Then she simply mailed the paper doc to The Intercept.

IIUC, the Intercept was not smart enough to do any further processing. They simply published an exact copy that was high enough quality that the tracker dots were reproduced. (really? Hard to believe). The leak was thus easily tracked to the shared printer used by Winner. Then it was trivial to narrow down to Winner.

The omission in the documentary is disturbing because that is the one fact that touches everyone. It’s a missed opportunity to inform consumers, who buy printers with an expectation that the printer will serve them - the owner. Printer makers have no legal obligation to surreptitiously fingerprint every page printed. They voluntarily decided to conspire against the hand that feeds them, the consumer, whose trust they should have lost.

Initially the EFF was tracking the models of compromised printers. Then they decided one day to end the project stating that so many printers do it that there is insufficient value to keeping track of them.

This is why I will not buy a color printer. No, it’s not paranoia (neither sensible paranoia nor crazy). It’s ethics. I have enough dignity and self-respect to refuse to feed my oppressors and buy something that is designed to deceptively work against me. Omitting the widespread existence of tracker dots from the video strips consumers of information about the insideous extent to which they are buying anti-consumer products.

The documentary itself is another instance of a supplier disservicing the paying consumer, by witholding useful information.

19
 
 

I literally can't win in society...so many issues, and additional issues. No one to work with to address as my few friends are isolating me for obvious reasons. Life overall sucks, but I'm thankful my mother is still around. I fear the day she passes.

Treat everyone nice folks..

20
 
 

I worked the night in Budapest, and stayed longer. My father tried to call me thrice, twice of which did actually get to me (loss of signal), but I didn't pick it up. Apparently he also sent me a few messages, but I didn't retrieve those*.

When I got home, of course that was the first thing I heard of, along with the stupidest reason yet.
(approximate from memory) "Why don't you pick up phone or reply to messages? We were really worried about you. There's pride over there right now desbite Orbán banning it. It's full of LGBT perverts, anything could have happened to you."

And the first time I told them I'll work the night (I don't know if I can use "nightshift" when it isn't shift work ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯), they were very strong on disagreeing with that, stating that if I'll be outside at night, I could "get raped by a homosexual".

* Calls are forwarded to my current number, but that's not an option for SMS. I updated my current number where relevant, leaving out just my family, which is basically just my parents and aunts spamming me with christian stuff or telling me to tell my mom to call them (why?). Retrieving SMS thus refers to switching the SIM card for like 2 minutes (switched to eSIM for convenience).

21
31
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by LodeMike@lemmy.today to c/rant
 
 

Its just an instance where tankies can exist in an echo chamber without having to critically think.

If you want you can read some of my comments here and watch these morons make fallacious argument after falacious argument, put words in my mouth, and project some person who makes similarly bad takes which exists inside their head onto me: https://lemmy.today/comment/17304484

Edit: there's also this thread: https://lemmy.today/post/32415724/17304693

22
 
 

Back in the before times, of the long long ago, there existed cable TV. We paid exorbitant rates for hundreds of channels, of which we watched but few. Clicking through endless channels for hours, only to find nothing. I often fantasied of a world in which we could pick and choose the channels, paying only for those we wanted.

Then, like manna from heaven, streaming services arrived. At last, video Xanadu had been realized. On demand, uninterrupted entertainment Bliss through my PC!

But it was not to last. Once the the streaming services' cable and broadcast competitors were crushed, the profiteers looked down from atop their overflowing money-bins and saw an opportunity for more profit through enshitification. Unabashedly, they reintroduced adds, before, during and after every on-demand episode. First Prime, then Netflix, and the rest.

We had many glorious years of unadulterated entertainment. They're gone now, fallen to corporate greed. Offended by Hulu's lengthy adds and Amazon's "Go add free" button, and the data scrapping voyeurism of online services, I've walked away from the lost paradise. Back to the simple & private shelter of books and DVDs.

23
 
 

I like UPS because the workers have a union, they take care of their drivers, and it seems like USPS is having some problems lately, which makes sense because the people in charge of it are actively trying to destroy it along with everything else.

So, I tried out UPS recently. It costs a little more but whatever.

I tried to ship a package to Canada. In addition to the tariffs, which are fun, UPS tacked on a "customs brokerage fee" which they attempted to charge to the recipient. Basically, as long as that person is paying tax and tariffs and God knows what else, we might as well collect $17.95 from them at the same time, because why not.

The person receiving the package told the UPS driver more or less "Get fucked, I'm not paying that. I'm not the one shipping the package, getting it to me is your problem not mine." I can sympathize. He said that he's had experience with doing that before, and the delivery company caved and he eventually got the package anyway. IDK what that's about, it sounds unlikely, but that's what he said.

Anyway, I talked with him, and eventually he agreed to pay this bullshit. I have spent half the morning at this point on the phone with UPS trying to get them to attempt redelivery of the package.

Actually, before that, when I was trying to sort everything out, I had some fun conversations where they explained this "customs brokerage fee" to me. I asked the guy several times if any other carrier charges this fee, and several times he responded to the question with long explanations without answering it, simply pretending that I had asked some other question. Because, as I now know, the answer is "no." It's just some random bullshit that UPS and only UPS does to international shipments. I think it's just an opportunity to snatch money from people while they're distracted and don't know what's going on, and don't have a lot of other options. If they presented to me this fee they were collecting when I was choosing to ship the package, I could say "fuck that I don't want that" and choose some other shipper.

Anyway, now that we've sorted out what's going on, I've been on the phone with UPS trying to get them to attempt redelivery so we can finally put this issue behind us and I can avoid UPS in the future for international shipments. The phone people just can't get their act together. Every person I talk to is surprised that I have an international shipment, and tells me I should have called worldwide shipping. I ask them for the phone number, and they give me the phone number I called. I point this out and they react with confusion and skepticism.

The first guy that I managed to get through this whole process with said that they can't find the package, took my email address (which took him four attempts to replicate even when I spelled it out very slowly), and said they would send me an email. The email I received was inviting me to set up a claim for a lost package. That's clearly not right, so I called back.

The second woman asked about transferring me to worldwide shipping, since I know now to ask about that first. I said fine but pointed out that I had called the exact same number she was giving me. She became very confused by this, and then launched into trying to help me anyway (?). She eventually told me back a bunch of information about the package that I had just told her, seemed to be reading to herself from some information she was looking up, and then told me to have the shipper contact UPS and create a MyChoice account. I asked her if she could just mark it to attempt redelivery, since I was already on the phone with her and she was UPS. In keeping with how the UPS people generally behave on the phone, I had to ask her this several times before she was willing to answer the question instead of just starting to talk about random stuff in a sympathetic tone of voice. It turned out that the answer was, no, she can't help me. I pointed out that UPS people had lied to me a few different times about how things would work, so I was a little skeptical. I realize this probably isn't a productive line of conversation for me to go down.

Anyway, she successfully attempted to pass me off to someone else as quickly as possible, so now I'm on hold. While listening to the music on speaker, I decided to make another attempt at setting up a ups.com account for myself. It didn't work the first time because it only works on Chrome, apparently, and browsing with Chrome is becoming a painful and insecure way to traverse the internet.

Anyway. Success! Now it wants me to set up my account.

I cannot possibly emphasize enough how little I want basic benefits like tracking notifications. I have the tracking number, I will check if I want to know what's going on with my package.

Wait! The person has answered the phone. I've now been on the phone, just for this call, for 34 minutes, just to reach the initial person who is apparently able to help me with this fairly simple issue. He is at least concise and seems to be able to understand the issue and what I want ("redeliver package pls") with a minimum of extraneous bizarro-world conversations where he repeats lots of details about my shipment back to me. He even knew the tracking number and asked me if he was looking at the right shipment, without me having to read it to him slowly and him fucking up taking it down multiple times as some other people I spoke to did. I feel like maybe that's just entertainment for them, if they're having a slow day, to make simpleton errors in the tracking number and see if they can get the customer wound up a little bit.

Update: After an extended hold, during which I got nowhere with the web site, he got back on the phone and reported that he had solved my issue, and they're planning to reattempt the delivery tomorrow.

I also am entertained to learn that this interaction was the only one that was followed up by a phone survey inviting me to indicate my level of satisfaction. I took the survey. I suspect that this segment of the operation somehow actually does care about their phone support people functioning at anything above "surly toddler" level, and so is following up about it, and that's why this man was competent. I suspect the rest of the operation mostly cares about saving money, not about anything competent happening to any person's package, and so that's the result they're getting.

I hit the button requesting to leave a voice comment at the end of the survey, but something fucked up in their system, and I wasn't able to. Oh well.

Don't use UPS for international shipments. Maybe not for other shipments.

24
46
submitted 11 months ago by user224 to c/rant
 
 

Usually they're tolerable, just annoying.

The screenshot is from one I found installed outside Lidl (supermarket) now, above the entrance. Probably loud enough to "cover" the entire parking lot. Loud enough to get painful after a few seconds. Sweeping between 15.5kHz to 18.7kHz. For comparison, a CRT TV is around 15.7kHz.

I wonder if not caring about loudness of these higher frequencies contributes to hearing damage among people.

Lower frequency, but also awfully loud buzzers can be found in trains near doors, working as a warning when the doors are closing. Thankfully, this probably annoyed some of the staff enough for them to start taping these over.
But those are loud enough to sound distorted.

Anyway, I just hid behind a corner where I couldn't hear it that much while waiting for the manager to call us in.

25
 
 

Racism, genocides, discrimination, war, none of it. She would gladly watch people die and get hurt and I know she would because it doesn’t hinder or even “affect” her (it does).

How can people be like this and watch people suffer? Abuse people and hurt minorities and not care if they get mass killed? What is wrong with people? Why?? There’s no hope for an adult like this IMO.

view more: next ›