this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
137 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22613 readers
4579 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Excerpt:


It has taken nearly a decade for St. Louis’ Civilian Oversight Board to find the footing needed to effectively investigate police misconduct and give residents the tools to hold police accountable, says board member Keith Rose. The city established the board in the years following the Black Lives Matter protests in nearby Ferguson, where grassroots organizers amplified calls to end police violence. But the board faced obstacles at every turn, from legal battles with police unions to the police department’s refusal to cooperate with investigations.

“It feels like we only just now got to the place where we have a path to do the work, after delays from lawsuits and police noncooperation. It finally feels like the board is ready to do the work,” Rose told Bolts.

But the state of Missouri is poised to wreck community oversight over policing in St. Louis. Governor Mike Kehoe on Wednesday signed a bill that ends the city’s ability to run its own police department, transferring control to the GOP-run state government. Going forward, the department will be led by a board mostly appointed by the Republican governor. The new law, which passed with the support of police unions, also requires St. Louis to commit 25 percent of its budget to policing by 2028.

“In order to prevent additional oversight, the police union has decided to go out and find representatives that do not represent the people of St. Louis and ask them to take over,” Rose said. “No reform is palatable enough for the police unions.”

There is a dark precedent for Missouri state officials seizing control of law enforcement in this city. On the eve of the Civil War, a secessionist governor took over the local police, worried that the city may otherwise resist his hopes of having Missouri join the Confederacy. He proceeded to pack the new state-run board with secessionist members, according to Chris Gordon, a historian with the Missouri Historical Society.

This state control then remained in place for well over 150 years. Only in 2012 did 64 percent of Missourians approve a measure to let St. Louis, which has a large Black population, run its own police force. The new law overrides that reform, returning control to the state leadership, which is largely white.


top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

Abolish the police?

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So they'll take responsibility for crime in St Louis, right? Right?

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 9 points 2 days ago

Cities are running rampant with crime because of the Democrats.

  • Republicans
[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago

Time for locals to create their own 'constitutional sheriff's' movement.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What the fuck? How the hell is that constitutional?

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Basically local authority is devolved from regional authority. And they claimed it back. Constitution has nothing to say here really. What it is, though, is a shady as fuck political power play. And if you don't like this shit, stop electing fuckwads.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Constitution has nothing to say here really.

Fair enough, but it sure as hell should. How are the people of St. Louis not literally up in arms over this?

[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because the precedent that this is based on is the Mob's capture of the Kansas City police in the last 20s, and the people who would be against this aren't going to go to bat for the cops.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

the cops wanted this, because it will remove new local accountability and oversight. the state won't give a shit what they (the cops) do.

meanwhile, the city is forced to increase the police department budget and maintain funding at a high level, based on percent of budget. this effectively jacks the costs up on any local initiative or project or service the city wants to or needs to do: want to direct $5 million of city funds to a literacy campaign? gotta give the cops another $1m+, too

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah, this is pretty much intend to destroy St. Louis as a city and remove Missouri's last relevance on the national stage.