This article posits that at least 1% of scribes of medieval manuscripts were women, potentially more, but that's a far cry from "most"
this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
42 points (100.0% liked)
History
23418 readers
191 users here now
Welcome to c/history! History is written by the posters.
c/history is a comm for discussion about history so feel free to talk and post about articles, books, videos, events or historical figures you find interesting
Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.
Do not post reactionary or imperialist takes (criticism is fine, but don't pull nonsense from whatever chud author is out there).
When sharing historical facts, remember to provide credible souces or citations.
Historical Disinformation will be removed
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Medieval gender policing wasnt as ultimate as some people believe but surprising number doesnt mean "most" scribes.
Medieval gender policing wasnt as ultimate as some people believe
Liberal whiggish history looking at how sexism was even more common and accepted 50+ years ago than it is today and assuming a linear regression into the past.
The most absurd take I ever saw in this vein was a writing advice book claiming that literally every single person in medieval Europe hated gay people.
They thought that "gay" was more like a sex position and the church considered women on top as sodomy and in general didnt like sex that resulted in procreation, even men kissing women on the lips was controversial. Not to mention "italian vices" - which was more post-middle ages but anyways.
How much of a chance this is trans erasure 🤔
This is a certified Vorin moment.