this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
33 points (97.1% liked)

Science

23450 readers
35 users here now

Welcome to Hexbear's science community!

Subscribe to see posts about research and scientific coverage of current events

No distasteful shitposting, pseudoscience, or COVID-19 misinformation.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Here we explore how imperial structures contributed to set the level of inequality in two ancient empires, the Roman Empire ca. 165 CE and the Chinese Han Empire ca. 2 CE. We estimate the overall levels of imperial inequality as the combination of inequality between and within regions. We find that the Han Empire was, overall, more unequal and extractive than the Roman Empire. Other empires, however, were even more extractive, as shown by a comparison with the Aztec Empire ca. 1492. We argue that higher inequality increased the potential for political instability and the collapse of empires.

all 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's comparing the Roman empire during Pax Romana with Western Han 7 years before it was overthrown and replaced with the short-lived Xin dynasty. Not a very fair comparison.

[–] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago

I mean at that time, how far away was any chinese dynasty from being replaced?

[–] spectre@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago

Appreciate you putting the abstract in the post