this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2025
29 points (91.4% liked)

Ask Lemmygrad

948 readers
83 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey there, sometimes I see people say that AI art is stealing real artists' work, but I also saw someone say that AI doesn't steal anything, does anyone know for sure? Also here's a twitter thread by Marxist twitter user 'Professional hog groomer' talking about AI art: https://x.com/bidetmarxman/status/1905354832774324356

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

AI and so many other pointless online discourse^TM^ that can summarized as "does X suck/should X be abolished/will X exist under socialism" follow two basic sides of an argument:

  1. X only sucks because of capitalism and under socialism, X will actually be good for society.

  2. X will undergo such qualitative change under socialism that it is no longer X but Y.

All AI discourse^TM^ follow this basic pattern. On one side, you have people like bidetmarxman who argue that AI only sucks because capitalism sucks and on the other side, you have people say that AI sucks while also saying that the various algorithms and technologies that are present in useful automation doesn't count as AI but is something different.

The way to not fall into the trap is to ask these simple questions:

  1. Does X exists in AES?

  2. What is AES's relationship with X?

If we try to apply this to AI in general, the answers are very simple. AI is not only pushed by the Chinese state, but it's already very much part of Chinese society where even average people benefit from things like self-driving buses. China is even incorporating AI within its educational curriculum. This makes sense since people are going to use it anyways, so might as well educate them on proper use and the pitfalls of misuse.

The question of AI art within China is far murkier. There seems to be some hesitation. For example, there was a recent law passed that stated AI art must be labeled as such. I don't think they would make an effort to enforce disclosure of AI art being AI art if it were so innocent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bunbun@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What a crazy conversation. "Art" and "machine made" is an oxymoron, that's it. Without the human component, the techniques and experiences of an artist (however complex they might be), with no intent or thought behind it there is no reason for it to exist. This idea is one step removed from sitting in a plastic garden with drone birds flying around, reading your AI book and listening to AI music, while an AI robot raises your AI engineered children. This is death of the human condition, not technological progress.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mzuark@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

Just another way to be lazy

[–] big_spoon@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 1 week ago

well...in my experience, one side (people who draws good or bad and live making porn commissions mostly) complain that AI art is stealing their monies and produce "soulless slop"

and the other side (gooners without money and techbros) argue that this is the future of eternal pleasure making lewd pics of big breasted women without dealing with artistic divas, paying money or "wokeness"

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›