this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2025
84 points (100.0% liked)

OpenStreetMap community

4743 readers
10 users here now

Everything #OpenStreetMap related is welcome: software releases, showing of your work, questions about how to tag something, as long as it has to do with OpenStreetMap or OpenStreetMap-related software.

OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.

Join OpenStreetMap and start mapping: https://www.openstreetmap.org/.

There are many communication channels about OSM, many organized around a certain country or region. Discover them on https://openstreetmap.community/

https://mapcomplete.org/ is an easy-to-use website to view, edit and add points (such as shops, restaurants and others)

https://learnosm.org/en/ has a lot of information for beginners too.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Do i select yes, because it, even if unintentionally, is lit or do i choose yes only when the bus stop has its own lights?

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PorcupineSlippers@lemmy.ml 65 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not sure either way but I just wanted to compliment the drawing. Well done

[–] enemenemu@lemm.ee 44 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why would you put a dedicated bus stop street lamp right besides the street lamp?

To me, this is lit. If one removes the street lamp it is no longer lit.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

i've seen the same sort of stops all through this village (small city?) and their placements seems clearly arbitrary. I chose no for all the others. This one was confusing.

[–] filtoid@lemmy.ml 44 points 1 month ago

I'm not particularly aware of the rules of the community but I would assume the intention is to indicate if the bus stop is "lit safely" for those who feel more vulnerable at night, such as women, the very young, and the very old. So I would perhaps interpret it that way - does it feel "safe" for things such as if a paving stone is loose, would you see it, or could an attacker get too close before you saw them.

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This discussion is both lit and bussin

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 9 points 1 month ago

Frfr, No cap on god

[–] hamlet@en.osm.town 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago

thanks. That's very helpful

I will tag it as lit

[–] tazeycrazy@feddit.uk 20 points 1 month ago

I love this community court. Need some second opinions when there are edge cases.

[–] Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 month ago

It's called "lit" and not "lamp", so from my interpretation, it's just about whether there's light there or it's dark. Practically speaking, it doesn't really matter anyway where the light comes from when it comes to whether it's dark there or not.

[–] Doudouosm@en.osm.town 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@merde "Lit" is broad in OpenStreetMap. The Wiki is enlightening on this (pun intended): "Lights do not need to be purpose-built to lit this specific object". See also the tagging examples and accompanying pictures of bus stops:
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lit
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus/_stop

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

for example footway lit by a billboard or nearby motorway still can be lit=yes.

then we can't answer this question unless it's night, when we can check for all possible light sources around the stop

[–] Doudouosm@en.osm.town 3 points 1 month ago

@merde Yes, strictly speaking, it would require visual inspection. Depending on the situation and surroundings, common sense could suffice.

[–] vatlark@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Thank you for asking, I have wondered the same.