this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
30 points (94.1% liked)

GayBros

1293 readers
2 users here now

By GayBros, for GayBros. Almost everything is allowed.

Rules:
  1. Remember the human.
  2. We are all bros here;
  3. Posts with NSFW images are NOT allowed: This is not a porn community.

You can find other communities/instances in https://lemmyverse.net/.


If you want a porn related community, check out /c/gaybrosgonewild@lemmynsfw.com. Their sidebar also has other nsfw communities. If you want to see NSFW content, you have to go to your account settings and enable the option to see NSFW content.


Logo design credit goes to @snowe@programming.dev

Banner design credit goes to @Speckle@lemmy.world


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Legal experts say the full ramifications of the ruling are still unclear.

J.K. Rowling reportedly donated £70,000 to the appellant, For Women Scotland, in 2024.

Really terrible news for our trans brothers and sisters in the UK.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Fine: Sounds like there are four genders, and each should get equal protections under the law.

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm hoping that this ruling was made in an attempt to show that the current law is absurd

I have hope that a fundamental legislative change is in the works, but it needed the fuse to be lit by something stupid and hateful like this

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

From the comments from the judges it seems that they don't think the current shape of the law is good but they don't have the authority to apply a different interpretation (not surprising that British law is not inclusive). So it is up to parliament to change the law.

But it also sounds like Scotland has to change how they do things? Or make an additional law for Scotland that covers how they have been doing things so far.

[–] Agosagror@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago

I believe that Scotland was trying to build law off of the fact that transwomen counted as women under the equality act. But frankly this whole case has been blown up to cause outrage, and in the process what is actually going on has been badly reported on. So I might be wrong.