this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2025
428 points (92.3% liked)

Technology

69449 readers
3183 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CouncilOfFriends@slrpnk.net 212 points 1 week ago (3 children)

By tuning the “Gaussian length” of the channel, the team achieved two‑dimensional super‑injection, which is an effectively limitless charge surge into the storage layer that bypasses the classical injection bottleneck.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 78 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Which episode of Star Trek is this from?

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The one where there's a problem with the holodeck.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you have any idea how little that narrows it down?

[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's the one where Barclay gets obsessed with his Holodeck program.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I don't think so. I just rewatched it. It's the one where Data finds out something to make himself more human. Picard tells him something profound and moving.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] the_tab_key@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago

They're just copying the description of the turbo encabulator.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 82 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

AI AI AI AI

Yawn

Wake me up if they figure out how to make this cheap enough to put in a normal person's server.

[–] Zip2@feddit.uk 121 points 1 week ago (4 children)

normal person’s server.

I’m pretty sure I speak for the majority of normal people, but we don’t have servers.

[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 53 points 1 week ago

Ikr...Dude thinks we're restaurants or something.

[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 45 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yeah, when you're a technology enthusiast, it's easy to forget that your average user doesn't have a home server - perhaps they just have a NAS or two.

(Kidding aside, I wish more people had NAS boxes. It's pretty disheartening to help someone find old media and they show a giant box of USB sticks and hard drives. In a good day. I do have a USB floppy drive and a DVD drive just in case.)

[–] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hello fellow home labber! I have a home built xpenology box, proxmox server with a dozen vm’s, a hackentosh, and a workstation with 44 cores running linux. Oh, and a usb floppy drive. We are out here.

I also like long walks in Oblivion.

[–] neatobuilds@lemmy.today 7 points 1 week ago

Man oblivion walks are the best until a crazy woman comes at you trying to steal your soul with a fancy sword

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] notabot@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You... you don't? Surely there's some mistake, have you checked down the back of your cupboard? Sometimes they fall down there. Where else do you keep your internet?

Appologies, I'm tired and that made more sense in my head.

[–] Zip2@feddit.uk 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Well obviously the internet is kept in a box, and it’s wireless. The elders of the internet let me borrow it occasionally.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] minoscopede@lemmy.world 76 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Link to the actual paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08839-w

The repro and verification will take time. Months or even years. Don't trust anyone who says it's definitely real or definitely bunk. Time will tell.

[–] Jolteon@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

Speaking of, did you hear there's a new room temperature super conductor?

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 68 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

This article appeared in my feed just above another article about how China has the world's first operational thorium reactor. Meanwhile, the US is about to fight a civil war over whether vaccination causes measles and stripping away the last of our social programs in order to get our wealthiest people another 2% subsidy.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (10 children)

China and Russia worked very hard to get these rich stupid people in power.

It really started in 2016 when US security agencies released a joint report showing Russia was spreading misinformation to help Trump win the election.

Surprisingly, the "liberal tears compilations" and "something about an email server people didn't understand wasn't actually illegal" actually worked and drowned out the warnings from our security agencies.

I don't think China will be any better of a world leader tbh.

I see humanity's future as a boot stepping on a human face forever, unless humanity globally rejects kings, oligarchs, and dictators.

[–] Netux@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't forget the genius DNC folk, including HRC thought a pied piper strategy of boosting the circus peanut was a good idea.

If the Russians and Chinese did anything it was just capitalizing on an unforced error by the hubris of the centrist. One again, bernie would have won, but that was more distasteful to the ruling class than fascism.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Fuck the idiotic Americans that won't bother to immunize, never mind understanding science as a whole.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Too bad the US can't import any of it.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

they can if they pay 6382538% tariffs.

or was it 29403696%?

[–] errer@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

“These chips are 10,000 times faster, therefore we will increase our tariffs to 10,100%!”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 35 points 1 week ago (9 children)

China scientists

So, Chinese scientists?

[–] gwilikers@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] realitista@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think it's a slightly different connotation. "China scientists" infers scientists residing in China while not presuming their ethnicity, while "Chinese scientists" implies their ethnicity but not their location.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] liquidparasyte@pawb.social 10 points 1 week ago

Real talk, why is discussion around people and subjects in China so fucking weird?

If it's not referring to the entire population when it only applies to the government or a subset of them as a global "the Chinese" or doing silly shit like "China scientists" everyone's grammatical skills suddenly tank when even broaching a topic even tangential to the PRC.

[–] pycorax@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Probably because is an ethnicity and nationality. There are ethnic Chinese people all over the world and a few countries and regions are made of a majority of ethnic Chinese but are not related to China. Calling them the same thing is playing into the PRC's "all ethnic Chinese pledge their allegiance to China" nonsense.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Etienne_Dahu@jlai.lu 8 points 1 week ago

No, it's people who study fine tableware.

[–] DasSkelett@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Seriously, for me a "China scientist" is someone doing research on China, like a space scientist would do research on astronomy and similar. But I'm not a native English speaker, so, idk

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Brother, have you heard of buses? Even INSIDE cpus/socs bus speeds are a limitation. Also i fucking hate how the first thing people mention now is how ai could benefit from a jump in computing power.

Edit: I havent dabbled that much in high speed stuff yet but isnt the picosecond range so fast that the capacitance of simple traces and connectors between chips influence the rising and falling edge of chips?

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 8 points 1 week ago

That's pretty much my understanding. Most of the advancements happened in memory speeds are related to the physical proximity of the memory and more efficient transmission/decoding.

GDDR7 chips for example are packed as close as physically possible to the GPU die, and have insane read speeds of 28 Gbps/pin (and a 5090 has a 512-bit bus). Most of the limitation is the connection between GPU and RAM, so speeding up the chips internally 1000x won't have a noticeable impact without also improving the memory bus.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Clickbait article with some half truths. A discovery was made, it has little to do with Ai and real world applications will be much, MUCH more limited than what's being talked about here, and will also likely still take years to come out

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] KulunkelBoom@lemm.ee 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, but endurance. and accuracy. and longevity. How about those?

[–] AceBonobo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

And price and maye write more than 1 single bit

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Yeah... At best click baity as fuck, at worst a complete scam.

Any time there is a 10x or more in a headline you are 10x or more likely to be right by calling it BS.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Whenever they say X whatever times, I doubt it right away, because they always interpret the statistics in the dumbest ways possible. You have a solar panel that is 28% efficient. There is no way it can be 20x times as efficient, that's just clickbait.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You just fucking wait. Trump is bringing manufacturing to the US. And when that plant opens someday you'll be so sorry you doubted.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago

Wow, finally graphene has been cracked. Exciting times for portable low-energy computing

load more comments
view more: next ›