this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
765 points (99.9% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

60351 readers
377 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 73 points 6 days ago (5 children)

As someone in science that has used this many times, I can't emphasize enough how much this has accelerated research in the modern era. I am so grateful for her work.

[–] Treetrimmer@sh.itjust.works 26 points 6 days ago

Fr. After I graduated I was cut off from access to scientific literature, which is a major blow when trying to keep up in ones field.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 8 points 6 days ago

A huge aspect of this also is that it disproportionately benefits academics and students in parts of the world where there is less institutional access to journal subscriptions. That is to say that SciHub has been a significant force for democratising knowledge and countering historic inequities.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 6 days ago (4 children)

articles aren't - and cannot be - stolen; articles are meant to be read.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 23 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"Stolen"...where did the originals go?

[–] Suoko@feddit.it 4 points 6 days ago

Directly to zlibrary

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 5 days ago

You see, the problem, publishers, is that your "business" should not have been a business in the first place.

[–] PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social 24 points 6 days ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 23 points 6 days ago

Is that the Anna from Anna's archive?

/s

[–] ChillCapybara@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Filling in Aaron Swartz footsteps

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 4 points 5 days ago

Hopefully not all the way...

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

While it's true that publishers do something of value, the amount they charge is absurd.

What makes it even worse is that so many of the people involved are donating their labour. It reminds me of college sports in the US. The actual people doing the work, the athletes, are forced to do it for free. Meanwhile, a few select groups: coaches, TV networks, etc. are making huge amounts of money.

[–] dissipatersshik@ttrpg.network 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yeah, I have no problem with people being compensated for their work.

The problem is that the discussion usually ends at "compensation" and never includes "how much?" Useful idiots believe that whatever price is charged is always fair and necessary, which is sad.

In a system literally built around the amount of money we have, we sure do like to believe that magnitude doesn't matter.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Public knowledge can't be stolen IMHO

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sixtyforce@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 days ago

Mad respect.

[–] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 10 points 6 days ago
[–] belastend@slrpnk.net 5 points 6 days ago

She also has a very funny article about how Stalin is a God of Science

load more comments
view more: next ›