this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
46 points (67.2% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1108 readers
214 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

There's a post about it.

That post explicitly says it's not a place for debate or participation from users of other instances.

I'd like to respect that but I think events like this need debate and discussion because it helps to develop and evolve the culture of lemmy and the fediverse in general.

The post says:

This post is "FYI only" for blahaj lemmy members. It is not a debate, and is not intended for non blahaj lemmy users to weigh in and offer opinions.

I recently received reports of a feddit.uk user espousing transphobia. Specifically, this was a feddit.uk user refusing to use the word cis, repeating the "adult human female" dog whistle, and claiming that trans women are not women. I approached a member of the feddit.uk admin team and raised my concerns and sought clarification of their stance on posts like this, where the transphobia is mostly dogwhistles, and "civil disagreement" on the validity of trans folk.

I was told by the feddit.uk admin that their preferred response is this kind of transphobia is to "sort it out through discussion and voting". However, the comments in question are currently more upvoted than downvoted, and little "sorting out" has occurred. The posts remain in place.

At this point, the admin stopped responding to my messages despite being active elsewhere on lemmy. When it became clear they were ignoring my messages and had no intention of removing the posts in question, I made the decision to defederate the instance.

I know some folk agree with the feddit.uk admins approach of pushback through discussion and voting, but this instance is not designed to be that kind of space. Blahaj lemmy is meant to be a place where we can avoid the rampant transphobia universally visible on nearly every other social media platform, and where we can exist without needing to debate our right to do so.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Clearly not a power trip, just protecting their user space like they promised they will.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's crazy. I mean it's their instance and I don't think it was out of the realm for blahaj to do but over the post of one guy is crazy.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 2 hours ago

but over the post of one guy is crazy

Not the post of one guy. The response of the admins to that post. Refusing to remove the transphobia (because of, if we take them at their word, a misinterpretation of an unjust court ruling). Refusing to communicate with the blahaj admins.

[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago

It's totally reasonable for them to enforce their level of anti-bigotry protections to protect their safe space instance. It's not power tripping. Besides feddit.uk is full of full time labour centrist true believers and/or probable astroturfers and is is largely low value subreddit copy paste for their most substantial communities.

[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Ada‘s post contains no details or reasoning. Linking to the offending content would make this appear more deliberate.

The offending content was apparently this.

A woman is an adult female. A transwoman is an adult female who used to be male. It’s not difficult to grasp that they are different things. You can admit that and still believe that transwomen should be treated with dignity like anyone else.

Personally I don’t give a shit what bathroom people use or what they want to be referred to. I’ll go along with whatever… But a woman and a transwoman are different things, and it’s disingenuous to pretend otherwise. Always have been different things and always will be, no matter what the law states, now or in the future.

Kier’s words are still not transphobia. There is no fear, dislike, prejudice, discrimination, harassment, or violence in his statement. The scream of ‘transphobia’ is thrown around too much for anyone who disagrees with a narrow definition. Any disagreement is labelled as hate, and it’s silly.

Should a transwoman have the same rights and respect and opportunity as a woman (as per the legal definition)? Absolutely. Are they the same? No, they are not. Is that a hateful bigoted viewpoint worthy of scorn? I don’t believe so.

I don’t use the term cis. I use the term woman and you knew exactly what I meant. A blonde woman is a description of a woman’s hair colour and is a semantic-based response that is nothing to do with this point. You know this; it’s a foolish riposte that’s nothing at all to do with the clear and simple fact that a woman who used to be a man is not the same thing as a (cis) woman.

I can call it a woman who used to have a penis or a woman who used to be a man if you want me to be pedantic about it. Nothing to do with hair colour, or skin colour, or anything else except previously being a biological male and now identifying as a woman.

‘adult human female’ is not a dog whistle. It’s a legal and common-sense definition that you clearly understand but are trying to make out to be hate for some reason. I am not denying the legitimacy of transwomen; nor is Keir.

Transwomen and (cis) women are different things. And Transmen and (cis) men are different things. They have different names, which you yourself use for a reason. That reason being they are not the same thing. This is exactly the same as saying transwomen are not women, because they are not. They are transwomen.

It’s pretty simple.

Copied from here

[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

This is exactly how they propagandize fence-sitters and convert them into extremists.

They start with a factual and level-headed stance that's hard to argue against, here being that "Trans women are biologically different, but shouldn't be treated any differently," but then, by the end, they're sprinkling dog whistles and covertly separating them, because once you can view them as something external, it's easier to ignore or even support what happens to them later.

This is exactly the same as saying transwomen are not women, because they are not. They are transwomen.

Blatant transphobia wrapped in a level-headed blanket to covertly shift perspectives. I mean, even if you look over the first reply, having their actual intentions in mind, it becomes apparent that they were very careful not to imply that trans people are in any way the same as cis people, making sure to use more general terms like "deserve respect" in order to not contradict the idea that they're a totally separate entity. If the admins of feddit[.]uk are okay with this, defedding them was the right move.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

People are entitled to have their own opinions on a topic and should be free to discuss topics with out harassment from mods on other instances.

This line of reasoning is gestapo.

you are gonna talk as I told you or you won't talk at all

🤡

[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Everyone has the right to be bigoted without being harassed for it!

Okay, bigot. Blocked.

[–] Deathmonger@lemmings.world 4 points 1 day ago

That entire screed is a dogwhistle

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Blahaj.zone can do whatever they want, but to try and imply that the admins of feddit.uk (and users) are transphobic over this text is madness.

Respect to feddit.uk admins for not bowing to down to bullying.

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 hours ago

If you're concerned about implications, you need to be careful of your own, because you're implying that I think the feddit.uk admins are transphobic, when I think no such thing. They actively pushed back against transphobia in their comments, and not in a half hearted manner. They are quite clearly not transphobic.

However, leaving transphobia visible, even whilst pushing back against it is against their own instance rules, and allows transphobes to know they can safely post more transphobia in the future, as long as they keep it civil. And that last part is the bit that initiated defederation.

[–] Shayeta@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Wtf, this isn't hate. This is someone stating their perspective with no harmful intent. If anything that comment is a great starter to a serious discussion on the topic.

If Ada doesn't want such content on their instance they have the right to defederade and I fully support their right to it, no matter the reason (it is their instance after all).

I can understand why someone would disagree with that comment, but calling it transphobia or hate speech?

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (12 children)

The part that becomes transphobic is the insistence that the definitions are "transwoman" and "woman". A trans woman (note the space) is a type of woman, no one denies that. It'd be like using the term "blondewoman" and insisting that they are different from every other kind of "woman", and not included in womanhood.

Ada also pretty clearly stated why she didn't link to the offending content: 
https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/14101300 in that she didn't want to start a brigade, which I honestly think is pretty upstanding behaviour on her part. As well, I don't see where the actual content has been linked, so I think the commenter above you might be full of shit, unless they can give a source.

I'm not going to participate further in this circus after this comment though. ~~The second I saw Ada's post the other day, I knew there'd be a PTB post with people either ignorantly, or knowingly pushing transphobic viewpoints.~~ (Edit: I actually amend my statement. This comment thread was right at the top for me, but upon further reading people here have been really chill. Genuinely, thanks all for understanding that Blahaj is first and foremost a place for trans people to feel safe above any other concerns) It's the ignorance that gets to me honestly, as if we don't live in a world today where the majority of people aren't susceptible to the overt fascism of Mussolini and Hitler anymore. Fascists, and other bad actors, realised they had to become smarter and more subtle with the way they spread hatred. They sow plausible-sounding doubt about transgender healthcare, like saying trans "children" are put on hormones when that's only ever offered at 16 or older, or that these same "children" are given surgeries at 16 when no healthcare systems allow under 18 year olds to get surgery, and in fact many block trans adults from those life-saving procedures. It's designed to be "death by a thousand cuts" because straight up attacking trans folks right to exist will cause most people to push back against that.

Let me just ask you (the general you, not the person I'm replying to) what exactly the need for defining trans women as not biologically female actually is? Is it to stop us from using the women's bathroom? Well, if your goal is to reduce the amount of people sexually assaulted, that will surely fail, and I shouldn't have to explain why. Is it so that cis women can get the medical care they need, that differs from trans women? That's not a problem that exists, nor would most trans women deny that cis women have their own medical needs, when we obviously have our own too. Is it to stop trans women from going to DV shelters? Do you really think a woman that's being terrorised to the level of leaving her home is going to purposefully harm other women?

What is the actual need for defining trans women separately then? Why are certain people so obsessed by this need? The best answer I've got is the fact that the US executive government has decided to define them separately, and under the cover of that, they not only have stopped issuing passports with trans folks chosen gender marker, but have stopped issuing them in their gender assigned at birth as well. Let me repeat for you, trans folks Are Not Able To Get A Passport At All Anymore In The United States thanks to this manufactured debate around biological sex. I shudder to think about what comes next after an act like that.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] RymrgandsDaughter@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

makes sense to me, that is what blahaj is for 😒 besides people that agree with that user don't want to interact with blahaj. And those that do could do it elsewhere

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 10 points 1 day ago

literally the fediverse working exactly as intended… blahaj clearly states its purpose and lives by it. on any other instance it might be ptb, but on blahaj thats just good instance administration

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Seems fair, I don't think this is PTB

load more comments
view more: next ›