this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
27 points (93.5% liked)

Political Discussion and Commentary

581 readers
596 users here now

A place to discuss politics and offer political commentary. Self posts are preferred, but links to current events and news are allowed. Opinion pieces are welcome on a case by case basis, and discussion of and disagreement about issues is encouraged!

The intent is for this community to be an area for open & respectful discussion on current political issues, news & events, and that means we all have a responsibility to be open, honest, and sincere. We place as much emphasis on good content as good behavior, but the latter is more important if we want to ensure this community remains healthy and vibrant.

Content Rules:

  1. Self posts preferred.
  2. Opinion pieces and editorials are allowed on a case by case basis.
  3. No spam or self promotion.
  4. Do not post grievances about other communities or their moderators.

Commentary Rules

  1. Don’t be a jerk or do anything to prevent honest discussion.
  2. Stay on topic.
  3. Don’t criticize the person, criticize the argument.
  4. Provide credible sources whenever possible.
  5. Report bad behavior, please don’t retaliate. Reciprocal bad behavior will reflect poorly on both parties.
  6. Seek rule enforcement clarification via private message, not in comment threads.
  7. Abide by Lemmy's terms of service (attacks on other users, privacy, discrimination, etc).

Please try to up/downvote based on contribution to discussion, not on whether you agree or disagree with the commenter.

Partnered Communities:

Politics

Science

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump has shown that he doesn't care about the constitution by violating the 5th and 14th amendments, and he's toying with the idea of violating the 22nd and MAGA so far has been complicit. Do you think they might say something if he comes for the guns?

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You mean if he said something like "Take the guns first, go through due process second"

Because he said that and they voted for him anyway.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

They're even nodding along even though if Obama even hinted at something like this, paramedics would be called in to deal with the exploding heads.

[–] borf@lemmynsfw.com 23 points 1 week ago

You really still don't get it. "If Trump did this," "if Trump did that," that's literally never going to matter. Imagine these people had their "If" surgically removed. Literally everything is always about "us vs. them" and Trump is built into the "us" and minorities are built into the "them."

Would they support Trump taking guns away from Democrat voters, trans people, black people, unmarried women? Hell yeah they would! They are are on the other team. Would Trump take their guns away? Of course he wouldn't! Even if he passed a law that said "everybody has to turn in their guns," they'd smile and wink because they implicitly understand that "everybody" in that case means "people we don't like."

These hypotheticals, this logicking, this trying to figure out conservatives, just makes me fucking boil now. Please, please, will you all just get it already? They don't care about making sense and they never have, they only care about winning, and they think they have to hurt someone in order to win.

They. Are. Not. Redeemable.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 15 points 1 week ago
[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago

They'd grumble a bit...but then hand them over, content that Trump can always be trusted to do the right thing.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

They would willingly give them up, you wouldn't even need a buyback program. "Well, I guess he knows what he's doing!"

[–] TheFlopster@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Maybe if he came straight at it, his people would object. If he was going to do that, it probably would've been after the assassination attempt. So it feels highly unlikely. But he's got some options.

Option 1: "Folks, we need you to donate your guns to the police. They're so underfunded/under attack, they need as much help as they can get." And I bet a lot of people would do it. Now, would it be ALL the guns they own? Probably not. But they'd be giving them up voluntarily.

Option 2: He targets a specific group that conservatives hate, and claims he'll only take guns from them. "We're only going to take the guns from the ____________ (illegals/terrorists/minorities/atheists/jews/liberals), not you good folks." The cops proceed to confiscate (steal) them from anyone they happen across, including people who voted for Trump.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

including people who voted for Trump.

Who would refuse to accept that it was happening until it happened to them specifically.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

You all don't get it. He is absolutely going to do this, but only for people he doesn't like, and his fans will eat it up. Yes, the very same people who get all up in arms (literally) whenever a Democrat suggests that maybe there should be some restrictions on some weapons will enthusiastically cheer when the Trump government confiscates guns from people with too much melanin.

"We know that good, honest, God-fearing folk know how to take care of their guns, so we're going after the Gangbangers first!" And you know he will say "gangbangers"....

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 7 points 1 week ago

It might finally wake up some of those who are skeptical already. Unfortunately, several media outlets would portray them as domestic terrorists. The Trump administration would refuse to provide evidence, and ignore any court orders ruling that they do so.

Fox News would call them “traitors”. At least some of them would have their personal information mysteriously leaked. Homes would be vandalized. Jobs would be lost.

There would be no consequences. Life would continue as “normal” for most of us.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Do you think they might say something if he comes for the guns?

If we're talking MAGA response here, I it would depend the skin color of the people whose guns are being taken. To racist MAGA folk, they'd cheer on gun seizures of people of color.

[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

A few entertaining posts on !leopardsatemyface@lemmy.world . Nothing else of consequence.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"the gun loving liberals clinging to their second amendment is what ruined this country in the first place! that's why you see so much gun violence with the inner city gangs"

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

This, they had no problem dropping "Muh Freeze Peach" in favor of calling everything they didn't like "DEI"

[–] astrsk@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Didn’t he do that first term? Vaguely recall a minor vocal day or two about it.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

No he definitely did not take away everyone’s guns in his first term.