this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
6 points (80.0% liked)

Lemmy.world Support

3453 readers
8 users here now

Lemmy.world Support

Welcome to the official Lemmy.world Support community! Post your issues or questions about Lemmy.world here.

This community is for issues related to the Lemmy World instance only. For Lemmy software requests or bug reports, please go to the Lemmy github page.

This community is subject to the rules defined here for lemmy.world.

To open a support ticket Static Badge


You can also DM https://lemmy.world/u/lwreport or email report@lemmy.world (PGP Supported) if you need to reach our directly to the admin team.


Follow us for server news ๐Ÿ˜

Outages ๐Ÿ”ฅ

https://status.lemmy.world/



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The community currently has no mod and has previously attracted concerning content.

If a suitable volunteer mod who is interested in the community can be found I will happily step aside, however until that time I will moderate the sub in good faith and with clear rules.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[โ€“] Cypher@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I think of them more like the Yavin suggestions councillor, why do you ask?

[โ€“] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Is this a community that should exist?

[โ€“] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The community shouldn't have been born, that's for certain.

[โ€“] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago

Now that's the sort of antinatalism I can get behind

[โ€“] Cypher@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

I'm not antinatalist myself, and actively disagree with the premise but it isn't a new philosophical concept, and isn't an inherently violent philosophy.

If we shut down every community that had concerning elements or fringe extremists we likely wouldn't have online spaces like Lemmy in the first place.

At least this way I can set clear rules against advocating for violence and put a clear stop to the more extremist efilism content from leaking in. Or admins can close it and we can be done with the matter.

[โ€“] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It shouldn't, not as an ideology nor as a community. Fucking creepy people lusting after the extinction of mankind.

[โ€“] Cypher@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Antinatalism goes back as far as ancient Greek philosophy, and not all avenues of thought conclude that life must cease altogether.

To entertain thoughts you disagree with is an admirable thing and a core pillar of philosophy.

I chose not to call for the closure of the community and instead volunteered as a mod because I value philosophy and discussion and nothing more.

What the admins do is up to them.

[โ€“] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's a noble way to go, although i personally don't think that just because some philosophy is old it also has merit.

[โ€“] Cypher@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's true however my primary concern is that the community is open, and likely to attract users as the antinatalism and related subreddits have been banned.

If it remains open it needs a mod to ensure that extremist rhetoric isn't allowed to fester there.

[โ€“] kersploosh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I added you as the mod. I am also conflicted over whether this community should exist. But as long as it's here, it should at least have an active mod to keep an eye on things.

Thanks for volunteering.

[โ€“] Cypher@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Thanks, if admins determine the community should be closed I will understand. Until then, or until I find a more suitable moderator, I will do my best to be an impartial mod.

[โ€“] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[โ€“] Cypher@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yes I crossposted that to antinatalism and then noticed there was no modโ€ฆ because the previous mod appears to have been the bomber.