United States | News & Politics

8051 readers

163 users here now

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

pangyuehung@lemmy.ml

yogthos@lemmy.ml

Split US Supreme Court blocks religious charter school (www.msn.com)

submitted 1 week ago by FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world to c/usa@lemmy.ml

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday blocked a bid led by two Catholic dioceses to establish in Oklahoma the nation's first taxpayer-funded religious charter school in a major case involving religious rights in American education.

The 4-4 ruling left intact a lower court's decision that blocked the establishment of St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School. The lower court found that the proposed school would violate the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment limits on government involvement in religion.

Conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett recused herself from the Oklahoma case. Barrett is a former professor at Notre Dame Law School, which represents the school's organizers.

top 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Whoa.

I was not expecting a good headline out of this particular story, but here we are.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Barret excused herself. That's far more than I would have ever expected from her.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Agreed. I was a little shocked by that, as you know she of all people would love to run cover for more government-sponsored religious indoctrination.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Perhaps her honor's first real experience with totalitarianism has her honor shook.

[–] Majestic@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Because she knows there will be another stronger case in the future that she won't have to recuse from and that case will therefore be much more air-tight when she votes to allow it. No one will be able to attempt to undermine the ruling by claiming it was invalid on the basis of someone voting who should not.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Interesting that Barrett recused herself. Maybe that’s sign she would vote against this when it inevitably comes back from a different school.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I'm worried it's a sign she didn't think the case was strong enough and is signaling she WILL vote for one with a better case. I can't trust that her intentions are anything but self serving. Maybe this is self preservation on her part, but I won't give her the benefit of the doubt.

[–] Inucune@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Separation of church and state. One of the primary principles this country was founded on.