this post was submitted on 25 May 2025
127 points (98.5% liked)

Games

38773 readers
1240 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] commander@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Every laptop I've bought has come with Windows including gaming ones. Up to really powerful computers. Like having a 4080 in it or down to just integrated. I could be doing nothing and you'll hear the fan spin up hard on Windows.

On hardware with just integrated graphics, Windows just sucks compared to Linux. Fan spins up but you'll still get animation hitches as Windows background services are doing something. Switch to Linux and resource usage just matches up really well with what you know you've installed and set to run. Just whatever is popular: Ubuntu, Fedora, Mint, Pop_OS, etc compared to consumer Windows editions.

Plus it's nice installing an OS and not having to go through pages of telemetry opt-outs, encouragement to buy O365, OneDrive, Copilot+, Gamepass, create online MS account, etc. Windows went from a relatively neutral marketplace, besides the bundled software, to a platform for marketing MS and other companies subscription services

Neutral base of fairly standardized open source Linux operating systems is going to show itself overtime as preferable as these controlled platforms get monetized harder. Windows, MacOS, iOS, Android are all in varying stages of being subscription and marketing data farms

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 31 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

I think this screenshot is pretty telling.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Who would have predicted, a decade ago, that the path to the actual year of the linux desktop would be taken first through the linux handheld gaming PC?

... Also LoL at SpiderMan 2, the only one that does a single frame worse, which basically at this point is just a solid indicator that game is still unoptimized as all hell.

Old man Gabe has been playing the long game, for all these years.

Ex-MSFT employee on a mission to apparently save us all from MSFT this whole time hahaha

[–] simple@lemm.ee 24 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

The battery life test is even more damning. SteamOS in some cases had more than 2x better battery life.

[–] pycorax@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Do we know if it's entirely coming from SteamOS? Iirc the advantages it had over Windows on the Steam Deck were not even anywhere remotely this pronounced.

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 23 points 5 hours ago

Yeah you're right, I had mostly been looking at the difference between the steam deck and legion Go S on that chart and barely even noticed the difference between windows on the legion Go S there.

[–] Vince@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Interesting, I wonder if the games with a bigger improvement is more CPU bound than GPU bound

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 14 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

My understanding is it's mostly just the advantage of not having windows running hogging resources, so it should be a bigger gain for CPU bound games.

**Edit ** There can be performance gains from using vulkan over DirectX too, so there probably are GPU gains as well. It will depend on the game though

[–] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 6 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Hyped about the devices we're going to see over the next year or so. Should be just in time to replace my first release Steam Deck as a noticeable upgrade.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I know, right?!

I just hope that there’s enough movement in the market to not just push more developers to support Linux as a platform, but to disincentivise them from punishing players through lack of anti-cheat / incompatible DRM.

Also, low-key hyped for the (hopefully) eventual Steam Deck 2 once the market has re-aligned to a ‘new normal’ and Valve can once again push the envelope further!

[–] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I hope so too, but I don't think a shift that big is coming any time soon.

Linux users are still a tiny proportion of the online player base. Steam Deck sales are negligible compared to Switch or console sales.

I hope it happens eventually,but I think it's going to take much longer for AAA gaming corps to take Linux seriously.

[–] Asetru@feddit.org 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Had my deck preordered and am still using it regularly. I'm really happy with it and just recommended the oled to a friend. Just out of curiosity: why would you want to upgrade it already?

[–] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago

Mine was a pre-release preorder as well.

I wouldn't upgrade it now. Knowing me, I'll probably end up waiting till 2027 and buy a secondhand device from 2026.

I mostly play indie 2D games, so games I want still work fine. The revised Deck has a bunch of improvements I would have liked (OLED, WiFi 6, etc). If there are enough improvements in usability (screen, WiFi, size, battery, hardware power), then I'll upgrade and give the old device to my kids (who currently use it for more than 75% of the time anyway).

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 hours ago

I only got my deck last year, so it think I can hold off until the Deckard. Kind of okay paying 3 times as much for VR to not have it tied to Meta/Zuck.