this post was submitted on 28 May 2025
28 points (88.9% liked)

Crappy Correlations

452 readers
1 users here now

Post your correlation, but it better be funny damn it.

Note: Please keep it funny, and not political . There are plenty of other places on Lemmy to post more serious type of content.

This is a community just for some fun based on the spurious correlations website made by a university student.

https://www.tylervigen.com/spurious/random

I have no relation to him, but you can visit the link above and see any random correlation that you want.

You can make your own with no graphics or programming knowledge from imgflip here

If you do actually follow the link you will see not only the graph but an ai generated explanation and an AI scholarly paper that supports these correlations.

Who knows what is going to happen when the AIs pick up these hundreds of scholarly papers and put them in their training data. Anyone who wants to post a better blank graph can do so.

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] levzzz@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The graph is actually hyperbolic i think

[–] rbn@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

That was my thought as well but TBF we don't have numbers on the X and Y axis. If they aren't proportional, you can bend and strech the graph however you want.

[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

No I'm pretty sure it's literal

[–] h3mlocke@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Big if true (and near)

[–] Crumbgrabber@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Scientifically correct, Just like 7 of nine's body suit.

[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I only barely get the reference, unfortunately, and cannot truly appreciate this comment.