While I like the idea. The last thing we need to do, is give trump the power to do this.
this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
61 points (77.5% liked)
Technology
2977 readers
344 users here now
Which posts fit here?
Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
Post guidelines
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
....he has it? That's a power of the government. It may require more than just trump to say to do it, but he definitely has the ability to nationalize just about anything.
It's a dumb argument. SpaceX flourished because NASA is being destroyed by incompetent political overseers who can't follow a long term plan to save their lives (or avoid feeding at the trough). Nationalising SpaceX would just give the idiots screwing NASA even more to screw over. Elon's an asshole, but I'd rather not see the space program go on pause for the next fifty years. Again.
The Republican way...fuck up a well working system they say it sucks and then they make it more expensive and shitter, but one rich asshole get to control it
This has nothing to do with republicans. The fucking up of NASA was very much a bipartisan effort
The author wants the capabilities of SpaceX "brought into the sphere of democracy." That sounds less like nationalisation and more like selling it to a functioning government. I wouldn't trust Trump or his cronies to run things any more than I would Elon. Fortunately, Gwynne Shotwell is the functioning adult running the company and (mostly) managing Elon's interference.
Also
Any story about SpaceX as a font of private innovation because it’s free from state interference would be hard to square with the economic reality of the many billions it’s reaped from its numerous contracts, some public and some classified, with NASA and the Department of Defense. Without that, SpaceX in anything like its current form would be unthinkable.
Without "that" - meaning contracts to deliver services. Should they have not taken any government jobs? Does "build a new vehicle to deliver people to ISS" or "deliver satellites to orbit" count as state interference? This paragraph is idiocy. As far as I know, the only government money granted to SpaceX was ~25M from Texas to lure Starbase and Starlink production. Everything else was a contract or other performance-based funding.
SpaceX - with reusability - has undeniably changed the space industry on a global scale, and the decrease in $/kg to orbit is the main factor in our ability to access space and the solar system. The cost hadn't gotten meaningfully under $5,000/kg ever, with the Shuttle at $65k/kg, until Falcon 9 brought it to ~2500 and Heavy down to 1500. Starship (which has been performing successful tests with some explosive secondary goals) should get it to $200/kg. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cost-space-launches-low-earth-orbit
Fuck Trump. Fuck Musk and his drug-fueled slide into shitbaggery. Let SpaceX cook.
Sure, there's plenty of reporting, mostly with agendas. https://www.inc.com/kit-eaton/why-everyones-wrong-about-spacexs-starship-rocket-and-musk-is-probably-right/91195626
Perfect? No. Meeting more primary goals than not? Yes.
Flight 1 – Apr 20, 2023
Primary Goals:
❌ Integrated launch
❌ Stage separation
Secondary Goals:
❌ Booster splashdown
❌ Starship reentry
Flight 2 – Nov 18, 2023
Primary Goals:
✅ Hot staging
✅ Near-orbital trajectory
Secondary Goals:
❌ Booster recovery
❌ Starship reentry
Flight 3 – Mar 14, 2024
Primary Goals:
✅ Orbital velocity
✅ Propellant transfer demo
Secondary Goals:
❌ Payload deployment
❌ Raptor engine relight
Flight 4 – Jun 6, 2024
Primary Goals:
✅ Booster splashdown
✅ Starship reentry
Secondary Goals:
✅ Hot-stage ring jettison
✅ Landing flip maneuver
Flight 5 – Oct 13, 2024
Primary Goals:
✅ Booster catch with launch tower
✅ Starship splashdown
Secondary Goals:
✅ High-altitude flight
✅ Flap durability test
Flight 6 – Nov 19, 2024
Primary Goals:
✅ Booster recovery
✅ Starship reentry
Secondary Goals:
✅ Raptor relight in space
✅ Daylight splashdown
Flight 7 – Jan 16, 2025
Primary Goals:
✅ Booster catch
✅ Starship splashdown
Secondary Goals:
❌ Payload deployment
❌ Harmonic resonance test
Flight 8 – Mar 6, 2025
Primary Goals:
❌ Booster recovery
❌ Starship reentry
Secondary Goals:
❌ Payload deployment
❌ Thermal protection system test
Flight 9 – May 27, 2025
Primary Goals:
✅ Booster reuse
✅ Starship reentry (reached, failed in execution)
Secondary Goals:
❌ Payload deployment
❌ Raptor relight
❌ Heat shield tile test (data collected, vehicle lost)
The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon’s Governmental Subsidies and Contracts
I think it's a totally reasonable thing to do.
Honestly surprising to see the ratio here. (11⬆️ to 7⬇️ at time of posting.) Downvoters, I'm curious about your rationale: why do you think this is a bad idea?
Downvotes aren't for disagreeing with the article lol
My guess is corporations or conservatives don't like Jacobin?
The only time the government is willing to spend money on space exploration ( or anything for that matter) is if they are trying to play a game of "Im better then you" with other nations.
We have a public space agency in the US and they have done jack all in maned space exploration since the end of the Apollo program. And what little they have done has been massively overpriced.
In my opinion , it's best to have both public and commercial space flight programs. Greed in two different directions might actually accomplish something and I strongly believe that we need a STRONG space presence not just in our own solar system but in many systems throughout the galaxy for our own survival as a species.
And what little they have done has been massively overpriced.
NASA budget is nonexistent and everytime they start working on something meaningful they are forced to cancel the project due to funding cuts. It was at 4.41% of the federal spending during the peak of Apollo mission, it's 0.3% today.
SpaceX on the other hand enjoys those government handouts for doing nothing and reusing public tech, research and even personel (after Musk himself was able to fire those people) from NASA.
P.S. NASA missions might cost more, but they also don't explode as a way to "test shit". Public reaction to that would be a lot different, no?
Interesting. Thank you for sharing your perspective. I appreciate it.