this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
592 points (98.5% liked)

/0

1991 readers
16 users here now

Meta community. Discuss about this lemmy instance or lemmy in general.

Service Uptime view

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey m@tes, as y'all know, this instance has been anti-corporate GenAI positive since it's creation and as such we've typically allowed such content to be posted freely. However in the last few weeks we've had a bunch of drama from GenAI haters who insist on coming into our comms and starting slap-fights. This caused us to vote on a new rule to have the mandate to clear out this constant friction. This worked to an extent, but I think we can help foster a better community with the larger threadiverse.

One issue a lot of anti-GenAI people keep bringing is that while they can block dedicated comms like !stable_diffusion_art@lemmy.dbzer0.com, they don't have an easy option to avoid GenAI content in random other /0 comms as there's no way to filter it out. This kind of content has been seen to cause a lot of strife, because people complain about its existence, while /0 admins and mods based on the above rule, tend to sanction those complaining. This then causes drama loops with /c/YPTB and /c/FuckAI etc.

There is a good point to be made here that while we don't mind GenAI content in /0, there isn't a reason to not help others avoid it. So we want to institute the following soft rule by now:

Simply tag your posts which consist of primarily GenAI content with the [GenAI] tag in their title. Not only will frontends like Tesseract will natively parse this as a tag and display it accordingly, but people who dislike such content, can simply filter it out of their feeds. Eventually lemmy will add tags which will make this tagging more seamless, but for now a manual tag in the title will suffice.

This rule only applies to posts in non-explicit GenAI comms. The assumption is that people can simply block those comms completely anyway.

As I said, this is a soft rule for now. Soft in the sense that you're not going to be sanctioned for forgetting it, but we hope people will remind you to do so. This is a good-faith attempt by us to co-exist and help others avoid what they don't want to stumble onto, much like [NSFW] tags. So I hope you'll add do a good faith attempt to help us in this. Furthermore, people who come to posts tagged as GenAI explicitly to scold and start slap-fights, will give the admins and easier justification to clean up, since they could have just filtered out that content in the first place.

Cheers

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Soapbox@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

As a genAI hater, I appreciate this. I already block the dedicated communities as I see them in /all. This is helpful to filter out more of the outliers if posters cooperate and actually use the tag. (I think alot of genAI zealots get off on trying to see if people will notice their posts are AI.)

[–] xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 days ago

genAi isn’t the problem, the zealots and fraudsters using it like that is the problem.

I was wondering why everyone just didn't block the communities. Maybe their Lemmy clients do not have the option. I use Eternity and it works for me.

IMO the problem is a lack of tags on Lemmy, which are often used as content warnings. With a robust tagging system, people would be able to filter out tags they dislike, such as genAI or politics.

[–] zaknenou@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago

it seems to be for the better imo

[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

People should do this for stuff they generated with llms too. Realistically English needs evidentials, like tenses that explain the source.

Much unintentional disinformation would be cleared up if people stated the source. E.g. "I remember learning..." "Someone I trust told me..." "I heard an expert say..." "a statistical text generator emitted..." "a random internet comment said..."

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

You remember where you learned things? That's remembering like, twice as much stuff! I'm pretty sure my brain is just making up plausible memories to fill in the gaps.

Wait till you get to be super old like me. The shit my brain makes up aren't even plausible memories!

[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago

The things I consider myself informed enough to answer questions on.

[–] axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe 2 points 6 days ago

This is what they are gonna call cyborgs born in the year 2100

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

That wasn't very Anarchy of you. /joke

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 6 days ago

Yeah, that's gonna age reeeal well.

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 60 points 1 week ago

That's good I agree with this

[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 1 week ago (27 children)

Good, AI art fucking sucks.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 18 points 1 week ago (12 children)

I know, those are my favorite use cases 😏

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] UnrefinedChihuahua@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Can I ask what compelled you to join db0 after reading the sidebar? Honestly curious. If I hated AI that much, after seeing the tagline, I would have noped out.

[–] Nora@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 days ago

As someone who feels similarly about AI art, but joined db0 anyway: I like the other things they got going on and I'm not stupid enough to whine and complain about the one thing I don't like. (I guess, technically this is doing some of that but shut up xD)

It's like if I went to a bar that has a bunch of games in it, and one is a bunch of pool tables or something and I really hate pool, I'm not gonna throw a fuss demanding they remove it? Some people like it even if I think it's not that cool.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think this is a good addition. We shouldn't alienate other like-minded people because of slight disagreements in my mind "minor shit" like this, and this seems like the least that can be done.

Also, I believe this post should be tagged with [GenAi] because of the attached image? 😅

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, the tag is very much in the title yes ;)

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Re-reading it yeah it's in the middle, I'm just conditioned to think the format [TAG]:Title heh

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 week ago

Ye that's how most posts should look, but in my case I didn't want to add it twice

[–] whalebiologist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 week ago

I like gen ai and I think this rule is a nice gesture towards the other side. It's a good practice to cite your sources when you're online anyhow.

[–] Taser@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 week ago

FWIW, I approve/agree with this rule.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Most AI image generators that generate images add EXIF metadata indicating that the image is AI-generated. This helps people who want to identify AI-generated images readily.

In the case of ComfyUI, it even includes the entire workflow


like, another ComfyUI user can just grab the image, drop it onto their ComfyUI Web UI and they'll be right where the generating user was.

Unfortunately, EXIF metadata can contain location information


some cameras and such add it


and this metadata led to people posting images at places like Reddit being doxxed after they didn't realize that they were posting their GPS location and maybe real name, stuff that some cameras attach. As a result, a number of image-hosting places simply strip all metadata, to prevent users from from accidentally leaking this information.

Pict-rs, the software package that Lemmy hosts run to permit image uploads, does this. Unfortunately, it means that those "this is an AI-generated image" tags get stripped off.

So, for example, on my system, with ComfyUI, using ImageMagick:

$ identify -verbose output/ComfyUI_00312_.png 

"Properties:prompt" has a JSON encoding of the workflow.

Sample images generated by various AI image generators are readily-available on civitai.com.

For this generator that generated this image on civitai, it looks like the parameter is "Properties:parameters".

I believe that there are a small number of such tags today.

It would be technically possible to just not have pict-rs strip that particular tag (or tags, if there are multiple that a given generator adds?) off, have a list of "AI-generated tags", then have Lemmy add some visual indicator that an image is AI-generated. I'd suggest that this is probably a better longer-term route to indicate that an image is AI-generated than manually-tagging post titles, for a couple of reasons:

  • Spiders that index images on the Web will know that the image is AI-generated and can flag that for users and let them use that as a filtering criteria (e.g. Kagi Images permits for this). They aren't going to understand tags in post titles, but the metadata tags are somewhat universal.

  • Doesn't require manual effort if an image can have some indicator or flair or whatever put on it automatically. And I guarantee that some users are going to get this wrong just by accident, because different instances have different rules. Easier to change how a computer works than to change human behavior across-the-board.

  • Works on all instances.

  • The information remains attached to the image even if downloaded.

  • Works for images that aren't just the subject of single-image posts and don't have an associated title.

  • Speaking purely for myself, I kind of like the open-source, collaborative aspect of sharing the workflows or prompts, since it helps other users see how an image was created and learn from it; it's something that I'm glad to see the generators include, and I'm kind of sad that we strip it off on the Threadiverse.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I was wondering if you guys would catch the latest shitstorm on this. Definitely a necessary precaution. Its a good idea, and I hope it will be enough.

Its getting to the point where people are blanket terming us as unhinged and blocking the whole instance because debates are getting heated. :(

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The anti-ai people are sending death threats and transphobic remarks to mods.

They really need to step back and reassess their lives.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I got called an alt of db0 because I explained the instance's stance on Ai.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Imagine getting angry at something this trivial.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think it's more "imagine getting mad at people using it at all" because the social effects aren't trivial at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I mean...

I can imagine how artists struggling to make ends meet might be angry that work they'd spent years learning and honing their skills to produce was and is being crawled by tools made by a bunch of silver-spoon-chomping techbros who are marketing their products to businesses who employ artists as a way to employ less artists, and pay peanuts to those they do hire to wrangle prompts and fix AI mistakes instead of actually getting to make art.

And I can imagine how frustrating it is to see people minimize that struggle when it often benefits oligarchs and C-suite ghouls.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago (9 children)

This isn't exactly a capitalist tech-bro instance. So while I agree with there being a problem here, the problem is less genai and more about capitalism IMHO.

Which is why it can seem a bit silly to me to go after this instance of all things when it comes to genai.

That said, as always, I think db0's soft rule is a really great good faith effort to be accommodating to others, while staying true to the core of what the instance is about.

So I hope you'll see that part of things and tone it down in kind.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago

Kudos.

That's it, that's the comment

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's a good idea in spirit but the tags will mostly be used to brigade and not to filter in my opinion. Most apps dont even have the feature if I'm not mistaken.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If they brigade, we'll handle it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago

I already raised that concern as well, but I do think it's worth a try. Would be great to dupe the functionality of the NSFW tag for this purpose.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›