Surprise level: 0
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
It's always the ones you expect
Was he a drag queen?
What a sack of shit. Throw him into the volcano.
That's what Jesus said to do
More like a mill stone tied around their necks and thrown into the ocean. Magma is too quick if a death.
Magma is too quick if a death.
It would be an incredibly painful death. Magma/lava is incredibly dense, you would skitter along the top like a drop of water on a searing hot pan. And then pop.
I always fantasize about flying them 100 miles or more out into the Pacific and dropping them from the plane with ankle weights
The impact from hitting water at such velocity would kill them.
Drop them 100 miles out with nothing but their clothes instead. That would be a much more horrific experience; being able to tread water for a while, but nobody being able to find you.
Toddlers? Jesus Christ.
At first I misread that as "RJ MAY Distribute hundreds of child porn files" as in, he was allowed to because of some loophole
Does NY Post still use the term "child pornography" because their reader base is less mentally developed?
I'm confused - is it not child pornography?
I thought it was pretty widespread information, I guess not.
It's CSAM or child sexual abuse material, or just child abuse images. The article gets it right after the headline.
"Child porn" legitimizes/justifies it to the users and abusers and has connotation with consent.