My sense is that the article (and people in general) are dismissing the loss a little too easily. Here are my thoughts:
- IIRC it was the #3 instance by size in the entire FV. That's not nothing, and a lot of people were no doubt impacted.
- It was probably the most robust and resilient instance across the entire FV.
- The site-runner was a real pro at technical matters, and notably helped other instances deal with tech issues early on.
- The reason why the place went down, i.e. burnout and harassment across it's admin team, is something to be concerned about across the FV going forward. It's also something of an argument that for-profit social media networks (such as Reddit) have some key advantages over volunteer-based, FV-style networks.