I love it, because it is not an over exaggeration like it happens most of the time with memes, but actual, real diagram for WordPress.
I didn’t even notice that, that’s amazing
Well yeah, but it has little more consideration than just a RPI sitting on your table.
The good news is, based on the diagram looking like it's straight from AWS docs, there's a Cloud formation template for all that.
Bad news, good luck troubleshooting any of it if something breaks
More good news: There are lots of simpler hosts that are more deserving of your money than Jeff Bezos.
Name and shame. I'd love go start a new home project without bezobucks limiting what I can afford.
Depends on your region and use-cases.
As fellow german I luckily have an answer for smaller projects, where my non-techy mother-in-law hosts her own business wordpress since years without any issues. It's just a simple webhoster with ssh-login.
Best thing: it's pay-what-you-want. My first projects were 1€/mo because i was broke; nowadays I voluntary pay a bit more.
I’ve been with digital ocean for more years than I can remember. I love Digital Ocean. Their core product is great, great UI, API, and their new products have been great as well. I’m using their K8s managed install for a year or so now on a product with no issues.
I believe they have 1 click installs for Wordpresss.
Here’s a referral code for $200 over 2 months if anyone wants to try it:
Hetzner has €2/m webhost plan with Wordpress installer
I’m a huge fan of Fly.io. I deal with Kubernetes on AWS all day at work; Fly gives me the power of Kubernetes without the configuration hell that comes along with it. I just Dockerize my app and push it up.
Huge bonus points for multi-region support and Anycast IP addresses too. And they support IPv6 which is always a dealbreaker for me.
Shouln't AWS do this?
Arstechnica runs on WordPress on AWS, and they have a really nice series of articles about it. Sure, you could use just one EC2 instance for everything, but on a high traffic website you would need a bit more.
But how many sites really are high traffic?
That's the thing with almost all of the cloud stuff: reasonable at scale, but overcomplicated garbage for 95% of the users.
95%? More like 99.999%, considering how many Wordpress sites are there.
And in many of these 0.001% cases, simple horizontal scaling would do the trick.
And if you need more than that, just use something that can work on the edge.
Gets a $3000 bill because they picked the wrong instance type.
The equivalent of "just configure && make && make install bro, it's super easy"
(it never is)
Edit: Alright, is it just my browser or does lemmy not know how to hand ampersands? Test: && && & &
Do you ever make install for minutes just to have it crash at the end because you missed a completely random C dependency?
And then you find out you have that dependency but your linker decides to not take it and then you have it but a slightly other version and you decide it's not worth it
sobs uncontrollably
Uh...I mean...of course not
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
Could you do that in
``
though?
Oh wait,
4 spaces
./configure && make && make install
Three circumflexes
./configure && make && make install
Edit: nope, doesn't work using the browser interface
Maybe somebody is paranoid about injections?
Gotta do that for my blog. It'll score me my next job. Might cost me $300 a month for a blog no one reads.
If a basic Wordpress on aws (no load balancers or auto scaling) is all you need… it is super easy to run on aws. Like a few clicks easy. https://aws.amazon.com/lightsail/projects/wordpress/
But then, why use AWS?
Because how else do you tick off Cloud presence in your business bingo?
A fair point.
You might have too much money and wish to give a large portion of it to Jeff Bezos?
Installing WordPress through a traditional Apache server shared hosting account only requires one click, and you can host as many sites as you want for like $9 per month.
Been out of the game a long time. Is Wordpress still used heavily or are people shifting to other platforms? For all the easy power it had, it always required convincing to do what it wasn't originally intended to do. Dunno if that's still the case but seems it.
I had the same impression until recently. It's now evolved into a high end, professional content management system and a ton of very high traffic sites use it. Wired runs on WordPress. Here are some other sites
Oh yeah, it's used extensively. It's far and away the most popular CMS.
Last time I tried aws, took me like four hours to figure that I had to borrow another IP address (different than the ip I received when created the instance) in order point it at my domain. Took me a long time find that option in the menu too
Edit:added cohesion and some punctuation.
Please use punctuation.
The way it's written fits very well with the madness that's AWS, though.
Sorry,I had just waken up and my lemmy app (jerboa) is terrible when erasing words..got some punctuation erased.
This is difficult to read.
Why would you need autoscaling for the bastion server?
Autoscaling isn't only used the grow the number of servers under load, but also to guarantee availability of a fixed number. If the max is set to 1, the bastion host is protected against hardware failure, zone outages, or just you screwing up. Accidentally killed your bastion host? No problem, within a few minutes autoscaling will have provisioned a new one and you're good to go again.
Just load up a Terraform template and all that is abstracted away.
This guy ~~fucks~~ codes 😎
Accurate XD
From my personal experience, AWS is extremely powerful (especially on security and networking). If you cross the learning curve, and know automation or Infrastructure as Code (e.g. Terraform) then it's fast and easy to build almost any architecture.
But yes, it's overkill for a simple website or a simple setup (if one is not familiar with AWS).
Just use webinoly baremetal and call it a day
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.