350
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 99 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

A report from the staff of Denver Arts & Venues says three people complained at intermission and included this tidbit about what Boebert said as she left the building: “stuff like ‘do you know who I am,’ ‘I am on the board’ (and) ‘I will be contacting the mayor.’ ”

Boebert is not on the board of Denver’s Center for the Performing Arts.

Boebert is the queen of the Karens.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago

Literally nobody named Karen is that big of a shitbag.

[-] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 19 points 10 months ago

It's too bad another, less common label didn't come into common usage. I've known a number of Karens (and a couple of Chads) that were just people.

[-] Z3k3@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Chad is a name I had never heard before rhe memes is it common in the US?

[-] fubo@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

"Chad" is an old English name. In WWII, it was used by British soldiers in a form of the "Kilroy was here" meme. It was not common in the US prior to the 1940s, so we can hazard a guess that Americans picked it up from Brits during WWII.

It peaked in popularity for baby boys in the early 1970s. Around 20 years later, it became identified as a stereotypical name for an upper-class "frat boy" in Chicago. The more recent slang usage is a distant descendant of that usage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chad_(name)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilroy_was_here

[-] Z3k3@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

The fact it was old English kinda blows my mind. I'm from Scotland and never once heard it. Interesting read thank you

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

It was a popular name for boys born in the 70s and 80s.

[-] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago

Not common.

[-] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

The majority of all names are good people, but if there is one name that has a higher percentage of assholes than others it is probably Karen

[-] Fondots@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Totally unscientific, but I work in 911 dispatch and I'd say that off the top of my head probably the most common name I get for Karen-type calls is probably Carol, the male equivalent in probably Alan

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Solid boomer names. I’d say Karen’s are more gen-x names. Like I’d think it was a popular baby name in the 60s through 80s.

[-] Orbituary@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Lauren is a close second.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Given how naming entitled women Karen is an insult to women actually named Karen, I propose we replace "Karen" with Boebert.

For example: "She asked to see the manager because I wouldn't honor this expired $1 off coupon for our competitor. Then she said 'do you know who I am?!!!' She's such a Boebert."

[-] Iwasondigg@lemmy.one 51 points 10 months ago

You could boil down conservatism to an "astounding sense of entitlement."

[-] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

She'll make a model Fox News pundit if her constituents ever wise up.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago

She won her last election by like 505 votes...

Which is really close considering her district

[-] Beefytootz@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Her election came so close that the person running the NSFW bobo subreddit shut it down before she was announced the winner

[-] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

This is the weirdest election correlation I've ever heard

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

If she loses her election and starts an OF I would immediately subscribe.

Dunno why but she is hot as fuck and the more she shows me what a trashbag she is the more turned on I get.

[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

she may need some bleach, since they prefer to hire blondes

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

She may even be too stupid for Fox News.

[-] Fapper_McFapper@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

“The tides go in, the tides go out. You can’t explain that.” -Bill O’Reily

I think she’ll fit right in.

[-] Numberone@startrek.website 5 points 10 months ago

She's not blonde🤔

[-] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 17 points 10 months ago

It is just a case study, as plain as plain can be, that all you need to have is confidence, to dupe a significant portion of the population into making you their leader.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 19 points 10 months ago

It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.

Mark Twain

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Why can we just fool them the other direction then?

[-] legios@aussie.zone 1 points 10 months ago

"[...] fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again"

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

She's very pro-life.

Boebert didn’t care if she ruined the musical “Beetlejuice” playing at the Buell Theatre for anyone else, and she certainly didn’t care if the pregnant woman sitting behind her had to breathe her second-hand smoke from a vape pen.

...

“These people in front of us were outrageous. I’ve never seen anyone act like that before,” the woman, who lives in Denver and is in her 30s, said. It wasn’t until later during the play that someone informed her that the misbehaving theatergoer was, in fact, Boebert, a member of Congress.

The woman says Boebert took multiple long videos during the first half of the performance. When she asked Boebert to stop vaping, the congresswoman simply said “no,” the woman said. Boebert was also kissing the man she was with, and singing along loudly with her hands in the air, the woman said.

“At intermission, I asked, ‘Are there any other seats available? Can we sit somewhere else?’” the woman said. “The usher said, ‘You’re not the first complaint we had.’ ”

When the woman returned with her husband to their seats, she said Boebert called her a “sad and miserable person.”

“The guy she was with offered to buy me and my husband cocktails. I’m pregnant!” she said.

But the behavior continued, with Boebert using her phone to record several segments of the second half of the show.

https://www.denverpost.com/2023/09/13/lauren-boebert-beetlejuice-musical-denver-opinion/

[-] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 months ago

Boebert has also vehemently denied she was vaping since she was thrown out. Turns out there's a video and it's another example of what a vile human being she is.

https://nypost.com/2023/09/15/new-video-appears-to-show-lauren-boebert-vaping-at-show/

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Entitlement — Is that a nice way of saying “low class dumbass”?

[-] Elric@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Pure white trash

[-] spider@lemmy.nz 8 points 10 months ago

Lauren "Bim" Boebert

[-] Wilibus@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

How many times does she get off scott-free after these incidents before it stops being entitlement and becomes reality?

[-] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

There is a very good chance she will lose next year. This kind of thing just increases those odds so hopefully more of it will be caught on camera.

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

It was incredibly embarrassing.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

By 'embarrassing' do you mean 'hilarious?'

[-] just_ducky_in_NH@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

Maybe she thought it was The Rocky Horror Picture Show?

this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
350 points (94.9% liked)

politics

18129 readers
3684 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS