this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2025
503 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

73287 readers
4386 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 hours ago

Age-checking is just a backdoor to force everyone on the internet to identify themselves. Nobody cares about the kids, they care about purging the internet of political dissent and opposition.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] KumaSudosa@feddit.dk 3 points 2 hours ago

That's a respectable age! Personally I'm 69 years old.

[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 37 points 11 hours ago (6 children)

See, there are a few ways this could go.

  1. Age verification is as secure and private as promised, and it's left at that. I like to call this "the miracle", and we all know those don't happen.

  2. Age verification is as secure and private as promised, but a government asks for "access to data to prevent crime" - things degenerate from there. This is the "systemic failure" scenario.

  3. Age verification is as secure and private as promised, but new scams evolve around it to make it dangerous. This would be the "criminal element" scenario.

  4. Age verification is not as secure and private as promised, and a leak occurs destroying lives and careers. This is the "system failure" scenario.

  5. Age verification is as secure and private as promised, but a few companies start scraping and selling data, leading to widespread harms. This is the "unethical merchant" scenario, and the most likely outcome.

All in all, there is only one "ok" scenario, and a lot of horrific ones. The math says we're entirely boned ^_^

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I feel like people are downplaying how dangerous even the possibility of #2 is. A lot of nations are already targeting the LGBTQ community on a regular basis and this would massively assist to streamline persecution of "certain" citizens as well as the rapid spread of religious dogma. Both the U.S. and Australia are current testing grounds for these outcomes.

[–] Vinstaal0@feddit.nl -2 points 2 hours ago

In theory, it isn't hard to make it work, give everybody born on the same day a specific UUID and use that to authenticate with a database if it is true or false. Store the ID somewhere where the person has access to (ID/Passport/Digital passport etc) and it should be enough. Get IT persons and accountants to regularly audit it for security and if they keep logs/don't have UUID's per person etc.

But that's not how it seems to work for the UK at this time

[–] D_Air1@lemmy.ml 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Or all of the above while still not being "as secure and private as promised".

[–] emmy67@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

Nothing is ever as secure and private as promised.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

4, as it's already happening. It's just to be seen if people will have their lives ruined

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 2 points 4 hours ago

We would need politicians to be the victims. Then these fascist laws will suddenly be cancelled.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] queueBenSis@sh.itjust.works 55 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

these laws are all about control and tracking what you do online. they make the internet MORE dangerous, because (as with everything the government restricts or bans) there will be a black market, which is always more dangerous and exposes people to more things than they were looking for in the first place. you think dark web providers are gonna make you upload your id to stay compliant? no, they’re gonna continue anonymously operating through TOR and serve up some very questionably sourced content to those teens that are searching “boobs” and can no longer access pornhub

[–] G4Z@feddit.uk 8 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Fuck it, let's get back to something like the way it was.

Anonymous, amateur, just slightly hard to access to keep the mouth breathers out.

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

being able to use obscure internet forums does not preclude you from being a mouth breather

[–] Zink@programming.dev 2 points 4 hours ago

Well now that sounds a little like the fediverse itself!

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 10 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

I really, really dont want to search for porn on the dark net...

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 hours ago

That’s what this is going to become. And that’s another point to this. They can just go after people using the dark net claim it was for kiddie porn even if it wasn't. the masses will just believe them.

[–] xiwi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

There's like a gazillion porn sites on the clearnet though, I can't imagine them being able to track then all

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I am aware of many, I am just saying looking at the dark web is not a good idea because... well... OK we're all adults here. That's where all the CP is and I have no interest in seeing that shit.

[–] RepleteLocum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

That’s a kinda not true tho. There is a fuck ton of cp on the clear web. The only thing I can say, is that Twitter used to have a lot of spam posts with links to cp.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

There is so much of it on the internet in general that you can’t really do much about it. On top of the fact it is still all over torrent websites as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lofi_Haze@lemmy.zip 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Can someone tell me if people are actually doing this or just using VPNs? Or what other routes are there around this?

[–] londos@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

On the internet everyone will know you're a dog.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 5 points 12 hours ago

Mrreow? 😾

[–] npcknapsack@lemmy.ca 13 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Sucks, because it's going global and we can't seem to stop it. I'm fine with laws to age gate in terms of a button you click. If some kid is willing to say they're 15... well, let's make sure people are treating them as a 15 year old. But... making everyone deal with real verification is at best going to further entrench big business, and at worst, destroy the internet we love. And it raises the question: are trans teenagers talking to each other now creating adult content because the UK hates trans people?

[–] Vinstaal0@feddit.nl 1 points 2 hours ago

For porn and games etc. that should be enough yes, but for online gambling, opening stock market accounts etc we do need actual verification, but there are tons of methods of doing it so that the site only gets a true or false (18 or above) and the government gets obfuscated URL's so that the government doesn't know what you visited.

[–] jpablo68@infosec.pub 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Well time to sell thumbdrives to teenagers filled with "tutorials.mp4" and "online class.mp4" lol.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 hours ago

Just give em live distros with tor installed.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 74 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

This isn't about being "age-checked". It's about IDing everyone on the internet and tracking where they go and what they do.

The world we live in is far far worse than anything from 1984.

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago

Exactly this.

Governments have a rock hard boner for detailed face scans of every person.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

I think that's the tech side windfall, the age checking is entirely to put road blocks infront of boobies. They it will force places to just not service those regions because of the hurdles of convincing enough people to give their ID, some will, and more over time.

And it now gives I people a reason to actually create fake IDs or just more identity theft uses. Raise the value of obtaining people's ID is the windfall for the data rapers

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 57 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I will not be participating. I'll get around any barriers they put in place.

[–] shaggyb@lemmy.world 26 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

And if I can't, I'll just stop using the internet for anything I don't absolutely have to.

I don't really need my smartphone. A laptop will do.

[–] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 7 hours ago

You don't use the internet on a laptop?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›