this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
46 points (97.9% liked)

retrocomputing

5344 readers
1 users here now

Discussions on vintage and retrocomputing

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Some idiot saw this mouse and thought “I want to drive one of those”.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 6 points 9 months ago

LOL suddenly I understand why they call it a "tank mouse."

[–] vacuumflower 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I've just realized that using FPGA for such products is economically sane. I thought before that when they use FPGA for specific end products, that's because of military-like expectation to be able to change everything, or because of lacking effort and aiming for fans.

[–] i_am_not_a_robot@feddit.uk 3 points 9 months ago

Yeah, it's cheaper than fabricating new chip sets, and more accurate than emulation. You can also reprogram them if bugs are found, or you want it to pretend to be a completely different machine. They are ace!

[–] lemmyseizethemeans@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 9 months ago

This makes me happy. Y'all played virus?

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

I've been eyeing the new c64..I wonder how it compares to my vcs. They all seem to have the same general build philosophy.