this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
122 points (99.2% liked)

Hacker News

4408 readers
382 users here now

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

Source of the RSS Bot

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bell@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yay! I hope they figure out a way around the no-sideloading BS too

[–] hypna@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Do you have a reference on graphene being affected by the app signing? I tried to find an answer earlier, and came up with nothing.

[–] Bell@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

No I haven't heard one way or another

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

i would have thought it would be oneplus, but theyve recently made bootload unlocking more restrictive, unless theyre walking back on that for graphene

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

isnt that only in thier newer and future models, im using the 12r, and you can still unlock it, im not saavy enough to change the OS.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 months ago

i mean, newer and future models are the kinda relevant part for GrapheneOS to jump over and get a new market of users.

[–] pentastarm@piefed.ca 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Samsung phones are probably a no-go though, right? No way around their locked bootloader?

[–] manxu@piefed.social 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The phone would be shipping with GrapheneOS, you don't need to unlock the bootloader if you are the OEM installing the OS.

[–] arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

One of their comments mentions that having it preinstalled may or may not happen. The aim atm seems to be the current Pixel situation where you unlock the device and install it yourself.

[–] manxu@piefed.social 2 points 4 months ago

Interesting. I wonder if the OEM thinks they can remove the ability to do that after the fact.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The project explained that only Pixels have met its strict security and update requirements so far.

Have they explained before what these requirements are?

[–] dhhyfddehhfyy4673@fedia.io 6 points 4 months ago

Yeah, on their site iirc.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 months ago

We kind of know part of the answer. They want to be able to re-lock the bootloader. they also want to be able to use as new a version of Android as possible.

[–] glitching@lemmy.ml -2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I mean good for them for finally pulling their head outta their ass but this is again for rich people only. y'all who don't got no bricks of cash to spend on new & shiny slabs of glass - get fucked as usual.

[–] redparadise@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 4 months ago

Eh not really, in India you can get a 2nd hand Pixel "a" model a couple years old and have it last for nearly a decade with official support and GrapheneOS extended support, not bad value for money but certainly a bit more expensive than the most budget phones.