this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
50 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

6409 readers
95 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I assume this means their RAM and SSDs?

For RAM it kinda makes sense; others brands can just buy the ICs. But that’s quite an SSD brand to throw away.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

It'd be really funny if the AI bubble popped before they fully shut down Crucial.

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So the consumer market is not worth it?

I wonder why they didn't sell the brand to a third party, I guess they don't want to be tied to providing RAM.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yeah, they don’t want to muddy the Micron brand through association.

So the consumer market is not worth it?

I dunno about their flash controllers, but other brands can still buy Micron NAND/flash for SSDs and RAM sticks, as they already do.

They just don’t want to deal with all the expenses/headaches of retail, and all the extra management needed for that. It makes sense. And I can see how this is a convenient time to cut it since they can’t even supply Crucial with DRAM, anyway.