this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
205 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

69491 readers
4471 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Military leaders back Biden decision to keep Space Command in Colorado::Military leaders on Thursday defended President Joe Biden’s decision to nix U.S. Space Command’s planned move from Colorado to Alabama as a necessary and nonpolitical decision to avoid operational problems.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lonewalk@lemm.ee 51 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Dickinson, however, said internal studies showed some 88% of his civilian workforce would not leave Colorado Springs for Alabama.

💀

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

No shit. The amount of great housing in the Springs with relatively easy access to Peterson AFB is incredible. Plus, the milder climate and insulated economy make it a place people want to stay. Winters aren’t nearly as bad as people imagine since it’s on the plains side of the Rockies.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"Military leaders decide having Space Command in a nuclear proof mountain is better than, like, literally anywhere else."

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Space Command largely isn’t located in NORAD.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Shouldn't it be in space anyway?

[–] 5BC2E7@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Technically it’s in space and so is the earth

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I'll allow it.

[–] Kandorr@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Can we change the name to Starfleet, though??

[–] RojoSanIchiban@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Not yet, because it would imply we already have a fleet of spacecraft (which are top secret), so it'd let Spot out of the bag.

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

That, and the military is already having recruitment issues.

They can’t afford to lose all of those redshirts to exploding consoles and transporter accidents.

Man, what did Spot do to deserve that kind of treatment?

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 14 points 2 years ago

Or United Navy Space Command (UNSC) which sounds way more professional than Space Force.

[–] grinde@programming.dev 9 points 2 years ago

No, this is clearly Stargate Command. It's even in the same place!

[–] LeafOnTheWind@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

That will come after WW3...

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Still can't get over how when they announced the uniforms for Space Force they used desert camo.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I mean, I guess there's some precedent:

[–] jscummy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago

Most rocky planets are pretty desert like, they were just planning ahead. I guess that raises the question of if Space Force, or the Army, or Marines (dare I say Space Marines?) would handle land warfare on other planets

Does Tatooine have oil?

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Like when the official Navy Working Unuform was blue camo. And now it has been replaced with... green camo. For all those times you need to evade visual detection by Chiefs making sure you're actually participating in field day.