this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2025
22 points (100.0% liked)

Photography

7311 readers
1 users here now

c/photography is a community centered on the practice of amateur and professional photography. You can come here to discuss the gear, the technique and the culture related to the art of photography. You can also share your work, appreciate the others' and constructively critique each others work.

Please, be sure to read the rules before posting.

THE RULES

  1. Be nice to each other

This Lemmy Community is open to civil, friendly discussion about our common interest, photography. Excessively rude, mean, unfriendly, or hostile conduct is not permitted.

  1. Keep content on topic

All discussion threads must be photography related such as latest gear or art news, gear acquisition advices, photography related questions, etc...

  1. No politics or religion

This Lemmy Community is about photography and discussion around photography, not religion or politics.

  1. No classified ads or job offers

All is in the title. This is a casual discussion community.

  1. No spam or self-promotion

One post, one photo in the limit of 3 pictures in a 24 hours timespan. Do not flood the community with your pictures. Be patient, select your best work, and enjoy.

  1. If you want contructive critiques, use [Critique Wanted] in your title.

  2. Flair NSFW posts (nudity, gore, ...)

  3. Do not share your portfolio (instagram, flickr, or else...)

The aim of this community is to invite everyone to discuss around your photography. If you drop everything with one link, this become pointless. Portfolio posts will be deleted. You can however share your portfolio link in the comment section if another member wants to see more of your work.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm in the market for a compact, but durable camera to complement my dumbphone, but also be a potential gateway to 1080p amateur photography, mostly nature and street photography. I've narrowed my search to either the Olympus Tough TG-3 or TG-4, but I can't decide which one to get.

They have mostly identical specs, but have a few minor differences:

-TG-3 has manual exposure and TG-4 doesn't.

-TG-4 has manual focus and a live composite mode, as well as access to RAW format, with a slightly better battery.

Based on that, what does the community think might be the better option?

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jodanlime@midwest.social 5 points 2 months ago

I would much rather have RAW files and manual focus over manual exposure. Auto exposure gets better all the time and it's really pretty decent these days. But sometimes you want to take a picture of a mushroom or flower and the manual focus might be necessary to get the shot you want. But for myself the RAW files would probably be enough to push me towards the 4.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

From what I can see, the TG-4 has manual exposure. I don't know why it wouldn't... even my phone has it, and TG-4 is the newer camera.

I think the biggest difference will be the RAW output. I've found it useful to be able to go in after and fix white balance or slightly shift the exposure, which you can't do with the JPEGs.

The autofocus on both seems to have plenty of options for picking what to focus on. I've got a full manual mode on my camera, but I often just use the point tracking autofocus to pick out what I want in focus.

[–] Aufgehtsabgehts@feddit.org 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I couldn't find a hint for setting the shutter speed to a specific value. But you could use the Aperture-Mode to set your aperture, then set the ISO to a fixed value and then use exposure compensation to set the shutter speed? As a workaround.

But I wouldn't care that much about it, 90 % of the time you would be in Aperture-Mode. Those few times you would use Manual or S-Mode for some experiments are negligible, shooting in RAW would be much more important to me.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 2 points 2 months ago

I think the random review site I looked at had some wrong data, a different one comfirms there's no manual exposure. If OP could get your hands on one to try before buying, that'd be ideal, but might be unlikely to find in a local shop considering the age of these models.

I definitely agree, RAW seems like the most useful upgrade out of the things listed (with full manual focus being a bonus)