this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
95 points (99.0% liked)

news

786 readers
1121 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The idea that you need to earn a living implies you dont deserve to live. We produce vastly more than we consume. The idea that people need jobs or to work is laughable, we just need to eat the rich.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The idea that you need to earn a living implies you dont deserve to live.

Meanwhile the rich are thinking "The idea that you need to earn a living implies you do deserve to live," and drawing quite a different conclusion.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I just want AI suicide booths! That’s the future we deserve.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 10 points 2 months ago

We need a citizens income fast. Thing is the us is behind without even healthcare and things like public education are always on the chopping block. Rather than tarifs how about universal snap and rather than not allowing certain foods you only allow it for nationally produced food.

[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

“What are they gonna do when people have no jobs?”

Simple. Stride towards the guillotine, cheered on by millions of unemployed proles who ain’t taking it no more

[–] Krono@lemmy.today 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I would cheer on the guillotine much more than the average person, but let's be honest about what material conditions are required.

The French poor were paying 60% of their income on bread. That was not enough for guillotines. Only after a poor harvest, and added mismanagement, the prices rose to 80% of their income- only then did heads start to roll.

There were no guillotines in the great depression (probably in large part thanks to The New Deal). So for Americans to deploy a guillotine, it would require an economic collapse worse than the great depression.

Frankly, many of us will starve before Musk's head is in a basket.

[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

Nah, people are much more entitled now.

Mass unemployment will do it.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

I feel like technology tips the scale against a popular uprising pretty hard. You have sophisticated mass surveillance systems to track everyone, fully or semi automated drones and robots to deter or kill us. Automated oppression has already been deployed around the world successfully, and these same companies are behind much of it. There's no reason to think the default here is that the people win such a conflict and secure a right to live.

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

"They" don't give a fuck if we all starve, so long as their stock goes up half a point.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 2 months ago

they will flee to us to eu to grift from them.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Celebrate?

'We automated everything and that's bad somehow' is a stupid problem to have.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's "bad somehow" because people require money to live.

Automating everything will lead to a glorious utopia for maybe 10% of people and everyone else will be left to die in abject poverty.

I agree it is a very stupid problem to have. It's also a very real problem that we do have, right now, unless we do some major restructuring of our biggest world economies.

[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

I mean, isn’t that the current setup globally anyway?

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If you're starving it won't be easy to celebrate. Yes, automation should be a good thing. But under capitalism it won't be.

[–] Soulg@ani.social 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If things go the way they should and the entire world population gets to benefit from this, then you'd be right.

The problem right now is that there is literally zero indication that it will go that direction, and actually a lot of evidence that it specifically will go the opposite way, where the billionaires hoard all of the benefits and the rest just get to suffer and starve