134
submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

With the clock ticking down toward a government shutdown, Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz approached a Democratic lawmaker on the House floor this week with a surprising pitch.

Gaetz, who has been threatening Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s speakership almost daily, explained that his rebellion is motivated by a desire to find new leadership that keeps their word, tells the truth, and adheres to regular order – a message that this Democrat described to CNN as “utterly reasonable.”

Gaetz then floated veteran Republican Rep. Tom Cole of Oklahoma and House GOP Whip Tom Emmer of Minnesota as two alternative examples he had in mind, and then attempted to gauge whether this member would be open to supporting an effort to oust McCarthy. The Democrat told CNN there’s been internal discussions about a wide range of potential asks – from power-sharing agreements to policy ideas.

“In the last 48 hours, he’s not just talking to Democrats. I’m talking about like, the furthest left most progressive Democrats to moderates,” the House Democrat told CNN. “He’s a salesman right now.”

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 39 points 11 months ago

How ironic. Trying to work with Democrats to oust McCarthy because he wanted to work with Democrats??? What a tool.

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago

He was one of the people strongly opposed to McCarthy in the first place.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

I wonder if his beloved constituents know?

[-] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 38 points 11 months ago

new leadership that keeps their word, tells the truth, and adheres to regular order

So, no one from the GOP then. Got it.

[-] Vaggumon@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago

Not sure why Gaets is so interested in outing McCarthy, did he promise a 14 year old girl as tribute then not deliver?

[-] GrammatonCleric@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago

Pedophiles are spineless.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 14 points 11 months ago

We sure he's not a Martian, too? Jesus.

Look at that 'ead!

It's like an orange on a toothpick!

[-] nuachtan@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

It's like Sputnik! Quite spherical but pointy in bits.

[-] jrbaconcheese@yall.theatl.social 3 points 11 months ago
[-] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

It's like spoot-nik

[-] inspired@kbin.social 13 points 11 months ago

I don't know much about politics but given the situation it sounds to me like he's just hoping to get someone with a weaker hand into that already extremely tenuous position. Democrats shouldn't be fooled thinking "but they're more reasonable". That person will automatically have a weaker position than McCarthy just because they are the second choice so it won't matter much who the speaker is just the fact that they have zero room to maneuver. What might make it worthwhile despite this? I wonder whether Democrats can extract some binding commitments like non-reversible rule changes that survive at least for the session in order to secure their votes to oust McCarthy.

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

One usually doesn’t think comedy when they think of pedophiles, but that disgusting pig is hilarious.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


With the clock ticking down toward a government shutdown, Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz approached a Democratic lawmaker on the House floor this week with a surprising pitch.

Gaetz, who has been threatening Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s speakership almost daily, explained that his rebellion is motivated by a desire to find new leadership that keeps their word, tells the truth, and adheres to regular order – a message that this Democrat described to CNN as “utterly reasonable.”

“There’s a number of us … that are prepared to take the next action we need to take,” said GOP Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, who is working with a bipartisan group of lawmakers to circumvent leadership if there is a stalemate in the House – a process known as a discharge petition.

The wheeling-and-dealing illustrates how Democrats are now caught in the crosshairs of the GOP’s ongoing civil war, which has catapulted Congress to the brink of a government shutdown.

For their part, Democratic leaders are counseling their members to avoid getting locked into a position over McCarthy’s speakership, not wanting to do anything proactively, knowing that a misstep could have major ramifications for the House and their party.

The speaker, they argue, has violated their trust by launching an impeachment inquiry and going back on an agreement he struck with the White House on spending levels.


The original article contains 1,000 words, the summary contains 221 words. Saved 78%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] dan_linder@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago
this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
134 points (96.5% liked)

politics

18821 readers
4657 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS