Programming

24162 readers

699 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz

UlrikHD@programming.dev

Good, Fast, Cheap: Pick 3 or Get None (loup-vaillant.fr)

submitted 6 hours ago by HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org to c/programming@programming.dev

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Matches my own experience when working on software where quality matters, like large and long-running scientific projects: Even if there are tight time constraints, you won't sacrifice quality, because that would make you slower.

top 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Same for hardware builtin crypto, like encrypting storage. Except there it's 2 of 3.

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 hours ago

Wrong take on cheap, and addressed to the wrong party in the system. Efficiency and simplicity are already mandatory for being good, particularly in software.

This is why so many techbros should stick to software, or even better, sales. You are not the user.