this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2026
37 points (77.6% liked)

Programming

24251 readers
494 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jonathan7luke@lemmy.zip 85 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Sharing this from the article to hopefully save the post a few downvotes:

Coding was never the bottleneck. Not recently. Not in the last decade. Arguably not since we stopped feeding punchcards into machines.

Coding was never the bottleneck astronaut with gun meme

[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I feel this so much. I started doing a rewrite of a plugin wanting to understand how it does its work and the real bottleneck is not knowing what's being done, not how to write it down

[–] codeinabox@programming.dev 17 points 1 day ago

Thank you! I've added the image to the post as well.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Kind of on the author for giving the article a clickbaity title.

Today there’s lots of interest in “specification driven development” with GenAI as if it’s the hot new thing.

Agree with the author — “specification driven development” is like saying cold ice cream is the hot new thing.

[–] Technus@lemmy.zip 67 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've long maintained that actually writing code is only a small part of the job. Understanding the code that exists and knowing what code to write is 90% of it.

I don't personally feel that gen AI has a place in my work, because I think about the code as I'm writing it. By the time I have a complete enough understanding of what I want the code to do in order to write it into a prompt, the work is already mostly done, and banging out the code that remains and seeing it come to life is just pure catharsis.

The idea of having to hand-hold an LLM through figuring out the solution itself just doesn't sound fun to me. If I had to do that, I'd rather be teaching an actual human to do it.

[–] IpsumLauren@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The new bottleneck is reviewing the generated slop.

[–] calliope@retrolemmy.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well now writing/reviewing the code really is the bottleneck.

[–] IpsumLauren@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I meant reviewing the code generated by coworkers 🫤

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

So not really any materially different from 10 years ago?

[–] calliope@retrolemmy.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oh I know, I was agreeing with you! I obviously wasn’t clear though based on my number of upvotes.

Just seems funny

[–] dontsayaword@piefed.social 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Was writing code the bottleneck before? Or was it planning, alignment, learning, iteration, testing, etc?

[–] limer@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

I can hand write a lot very fast, but it only had value when I do the above.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's exactly what the article is about. Please read it, it's good.

[–] dontsayaword@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

You caught me reacting to the headline without reading it. I will check it out.