this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
104 points (100.0% liked)

Climate

8418 readers
860 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a reversal, the agency plans to calculate only the cost to industry when setting pollution limits, and not the monetary value of saving human lives, documents show.

all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lives saved vs Dollar$ made in America! who'da thunk!

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's even worse. Rather than comparing value, this is rating human life as categorically worthless for federal purposes.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Exactly. The only thing that matters is the profit, not human life, or health, or the natural world upon which we depend

[–] l_isqof@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

American lives are truly worthless...

[–] prex@aussie.zone 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Its not even a economic argument. Lives saved (and disease avoided) means more customers for companies.

[–] rimu@piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago

The cost to industry goes down as the limit increases, so....

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

US E.P.A. to start considering the impact on poor billionaires bank accounts when setting any rules at all to ensure they receive a fair treatment