“Such licensing also creates more incentives for the production of new creative content, to the benefit of both the public and AI developers,” it reads.
I mean, if you ignore the negative effects the IP system already has on creativity then yeah, sure, this is a reasonable conclusion. 75+ years of IP ownership, potentially locking up a comparatively short burst of an individual's creativity for several generations is just creates a rentier's economy in anything copyright related. By this mechanism this system harms creativity. Our current IP system supports the development of 'rights holder' investment companies.
Its the same garbage that we have with housing, the systems both support and promote investor rentiers over the genuine users and producers that constantly drive to make housing and music genuinely unique.