this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2026
238 points (99.6% liked)

Memes of Production

1360 readers
1133 users here now

Seize the Memes of Production

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JakenVeina@midwest.social 21 points 1 month ago

I'm surprised I've never made this connection before. What a wonderfully easy-for-most-people-to-understand analogy.

[–] psycotica0@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago

Mmmmmmmmmmm... I like the sentiment, but I don't think I agree. Real estate speculators are who you're describing, and they suck, but I don't think anyone would be shocked that they're like scalpers.

Landlords don't really care about hoarding or scarcity really, they're buying things to rent to people. Like blockbuster. I mean, letting other people live there is basically the point, it's not exactly hoarding...

[–] French75@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not everybody wants to buy a house. They serve a necessary market function.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Landlord’s do not. Community housing does.

[–] ranandtoldthat@beehaw.org 4 points 1 month ago

Vienna is a great example of this for anyone interested.

[–] rbn@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think it's similar to everything else in the economy. As long as the landlords are small, independent entities, I don't see much of a problem. But institutional investors amassing more and more wealth and power to the point that they can make their own rules, that's a significant issue IMO.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

No.

I’m in Australia. 72% of landlords own only one investment property. They fuck us over at every chance. It’s the same grift whoever plays it, they chase the highest market rates and pay the least expenses (I.e. neglect repairs, substandard maintenance, etc.)

There is no such thing as the ethical “mom and pop” landlords as Americans call it.

[–] rbn@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

they chase the highest market rates and pay the least expenses

As everyone else does. While I don't object your argument, I don't see this as a specific issue with landlords. It's just standard capitalism. Which sucks, but I personally think it's unfair to blame just that one group specifically.

If you need a plumber, someone to fix your car, someone to help your children in school or to repair your PC... Most contractors typically will charge as much as the market allows. Also supermarkets don't sell stuff cheaper out of goodwill. If the market gets out of control, it's the government's job to intervene and regulate. And unless it's a multi billion corporation I at least think that such regulation is possible.