this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2026
14 points (59.7% liked)

Selfhosted

55010 readers
606 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

a while ago we shared our peer-to-peer project here multiple times under the name Plebbit, and honestly you guys were right The name wasn’t it.

We have decided to rebrand to Bitsocial, which feels way cleaner and more serious for what we are building.

5chan, Seedit clients and any other app we will make, will all be branded as Bitsocial apps

All info (intro, docs, roadmap, links) to be released on bitsocial.net later this month.

We also took your feedback seriously and we are now implementing proper sign-in options like:

Google GitHub (and more coming later)

So yeah thanks for the honest feedback

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] drkt@scribe.disroot.org 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You are just not going to stop pushing this, are you? I'm glad you've learned not to associate your platform with crypto, but I still don't trust you and I don't want to reiterate how this WILL become a childporn haven when you don't have wide-spanning moderation.

Also your SSL cert is expired and the website is broken besides.

[–] EstebanAbaroa@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

on moderation : the protocol is not private or anonymous. It’s peer-to-peer, and IPs are visible in the swarm. anyone trying to post illegal content is not hidden and will get caught. Also, each community has its own mods, and clients can enforce their own rules similar to how Seedit is SFW by default.

There’s also a character limit, so you can’t base64-dump images posts.

. The proper landing page is going live next week.

We are building in public and taking feedbacks seriously.

[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 7 points 2 days ago

In before this is a big elaborate ad for NordVPN.

(VPNs and tor allow you to mask your IP)

[–] zer0squar3d@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You made an annoucement before your website even works and linked it? Why? I dont understand why anyone would trust you with this level of incompetence?

[–] EstebanAbaroa@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

we are still in the process of rebranding and the main info page (intro, docs, roadmap, links, etc.) will go live on bitsocial.net next week.

[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 12 points 2 days ago

Why not post here when everything is all ready? Fragmenting your big marketing push is just going to hurt you.

[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 15 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Honest comment: Bitsocial sounds an awful lot like Truth Social.

If that comparison is unintentional and not desired, maybe reconsider the name.

If that is intentional, we are probably not your target audience.

[–] priapus@piefed.social 17 points 2 days ago

Ngl I did not think about that at all. There are loads of sites with social in the name, like the flagship mastodon instance.

It seems kinda silly to stop using social as in the name for social websites because of them.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I hear BitTorrent with that name

[–] EstebanAbaroa@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

For us, Bitsocial just means BitTorrent for social media, nothing political.

[–] kumi@feddit.online 1 points 1 day ago

If not for political reasons then why limit first version to Google/GitHub rather than starting with generic OIDC (which should include those two anyway)?

We also took your feedback seriously and we are now implementing proper sign-in options like: Google GitHub (and more coming later)

[–] EstebanAbaroa@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

We chose BitSocial because it’s closer to “BitTorrent for social media”

the “bit” part is about peer-to-peer distribution and protocol design, not politics or ideology.

We are not trying to mirror Truth Social or target any specific political audience.

Our goal goal is a neutral, open-source, decentralized social media protocol.