this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2026
72 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14309 readers
565 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vovchik_ilich@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Implying the rest is capital revalorization?

[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] vovchik_ilich@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe I'm not correct on definitions here, but my understanding is that profit results from valorization but rents are distinct.

[–] vovchik_ilich@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago

Hmmm, I see your point. Some financial rents (i.e. state bonds) arguably don't come from revalorization through appropriation of labor. I'll think about it. Thanks for the input!

[–] gay_king_prince_charles@hexbear.net 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

nonfarm workers

What's so special about farm workers that they get excluded? How do they shift the data?

[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago

I don't really understand the convention of excluding farmworkers, but ag is a very small fraction of the US GDP, somewhere around 1%.

[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 3 points 1 month ago

I made a calculation of this last year and concluded that about 40% of GDP was wages and salaries. I suppose partnerships and sole proprietorships account for another 14%.