this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
36 points (76.5% liked)

Android

32934 readers
151 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the Android community on Lemmy. Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] darcmage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I might be alone in this but that felt like a long-winded way of saying very little about the current state of oneplus.

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 22 points 4 days ago

Don't really care what this Elon butt sniffer thinks about anything anyways.

[–] Ilandar@lemmy.today 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Yes, it was really just an "enthusiast's" opinion on the history of the company. He referenced the older TechAltar video at the beginning and that was a much better, if more generalised, discussion. I'd actually be more interested to hear about the "downfall" of Nothing, since it's a newer brand I haven't really followed much and one that was sort of established in response to the "downfall" of OnePlus.

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Nothing if anything should be punished with failure for not using flagship processors. It’s absolutely insane to not even give the option.

[–] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

OnePlus certainly aren't having a "downfall" in my opinion. The latest OnePlus 15, although it has worse cameras, has a way bigger battery and still has the latest Snapdragon chip. The "Sandstone" finish also seems pretty cool, it's nice that they're experimenting with materials like that. The price hikes are not very nice though, but that's not really a specific issue of OnePlus, just general corporate greed from all smartphone manufacturers. OnePlus is certainly changing their target demographic away from camera-centric people like Marques, but that's hardly a "downfall". They are still selling a bunch of phones in many markets.

[–] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 5 points 4 days ago

Please note that I am not a corporate parrot of OnePlus espousing corporate propaganda. OnePlus is doing many things wrong, with OxygenOS basically becoming the AI-filled iOS-like-in-all-the-wrong-ways ColorOS, following the price hike trend, etc.

[–] in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Ilandar@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago

This has no verifiable source and was obviously written by AI.

[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I had the very original when they were “great”

They weren’t reliable and certainly weren’t worth buying subsequent models. They certainly marketed themselves as being pro consumer.

Android as a platform mostly just seems to exist to extract wealth via data harvesting anyway. If it’s not google it’s another company. Maybe this is all commercial “smart” devices and oses too.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The one plus one blew any competition far and away. It was an amazing phone and was very cheap. But as all things go, they used their success to start making higher profits.

[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

You had to fuck with it from time to time. It was very much a poweruser type device for people who wanted to tinker with shit.

It's the kind of thing I can happily use, but also the type of thing that is not generally a commercial success compared to models they likely want to benchmark against in MBA land.

Will definitely say that back then, smartphone choices were limited and mostly shit.