this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
26 points (100.0% liked)

Music Production

1094 readers
4 users here now

Please see most recent Meta community post here: On machine learning generative models


Welcome to Music Production@sh.itjust.works.
A place to share anything and everything you want about your music making journey! Learning is the goal, so discussion is encouraged!

Rules are as follows:

  1. Don't share other people's music without commentary, analysis or questions. This is not a music discovery community.
  2. No elitism or bigotry towards other people's music tastes. Be polite in disagreement.

We will update rules as necessary, but I promise we'll stay light on them and only add new ones after discussion!

Here are some useful examples of what a great post would be about:
(in no particular order)

  1. Stuff you made/are making. Get valuable feedback and criticism!
  2. Learning resources - videos, articles, posts on any topic concerning a production process, be it composition, sound design, sampling, mixing, mastering, DAW workflow or any other.
  3. Free plugins, presets and samplepacks. Giveaways and self-made stuff included!
  4. News about production software, releases and personalities.
  5. Questions and general advice about music production.
  6. Essays on your favorite productions. Inspirations and insights!
  7. Your physical analogue gear! Let us know how it performs!

Good to know: As a general word of caution, avoid posting complete compositions, mixes and tracks on the internet before backing them up on a remote and reputable server. Even small snippets or watermarked tracks should be posted AFTER backing it up to cloud. Timestamps from cloud services will help you in case of theft. And, as a public resource, Lemmy (and the broader fediverse) is not a safe place to post your unpublished work, so please make sure your work is protected.


RIP Waveform Social | RIP Lemmy Studio


Be nice. All instance rules apply.


Rules:

  • Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  • No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  • No Ads / Spamming.
  • No pornography.

Règles :

  • Soyez respectueux. Tout le monde doit se sentir le bienvenu ici.
  • Pas de bigoterie - y compris le racisme, le sexisme, le capacitisme, l’homophobie, la transphobie ou la xénophobie.
  • Pas de publicités / Pas de spam.
  • Pas de pornographie.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is some not great news. I've been using NI (as well as izotope & plugin alliance) stuff for a very long time, and have hardware from them too. I imagine there are a lot of small sound design studios selling kontakt instruments who are a bit scared for the future now.

I really hope they're able to find a good solution for creators with the administrators.

Edit:

MusicRadar article: https://www.musicradar.com/music-tech/native-instruments-has-been-placed-in-preliminary-insolvency

all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OpenHammer6677@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

What do you mean parent to iZotope, Plugin Alliance, and Brainworx? Goddamit capitalism

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Yep

They all merged a couple of years ago, I think also partly because of financial issues IIRC

I'd hoped they had got through the other side of that

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 9 points 4 weeks ago

Hell, iZotope was the standard for so many years. I use RX on my field recording to clean them up before making them into samples a lot of times.

Private equity kills everything, I swear. It doesn't help that UA went native mostly and Waves prices so aggressively, Arturia and Akai are innovating, and Spitfire and OT cut Kontakt out of the loop. However, I'm fucking sure it's like 90% on Francisco Partners getting rid of the support teams for outsourcing, deleting the highest paid engineers, stopped fixing bugs, and whatever the fuck they were doing with Soundwide instead of doing things for customers.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

I'm sorry for all the people who will be inconvenienced by this, but personally I hope this may have a positive outcome by hopefully ending the stranglehold NI has on sound font libraries (kontact), and increase adoption of open-source alternatives (SFZ).

NI was abusing their position as a virtual monopoly on soundfonts.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Firstly, I 100% completely agree that it would be good to have everyone move to an open alternative, but it simply doesn't practically exist yet. SFZ is as you describe, just a sound font, Kontakt is effectively a DAW in itself with how complex the instruments can get.

I could be wrong but I've read a number of times that a big part of its dominance is the development experience of kontakt keeping sound designers using it.

The dev tooling, licensing infrastructure and high standard of built-in effects and building blocks, etc are apparently more or less peerless even across other proprietary solutions. Professional sound designers ultimately want to build and sell their instruments, so any friction there is going to make them look elsewhere

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

That may be the case, but it seems to come down to the same chicken & the egg problem that most proprietary vs. free software has had to overcome. Proprietary software usually can offer a smoother UX because there isn't enough development of the FLOSS alternative, which is caused by a lack of users (and thus the potential pool of developers and financial donors) to motivate that UX becoming more polished.

For most, the lock-in of proprietary software was tolerable because it was at worst an inconvenience at times, or only incurred a semi-reasonable cost. But we're seeing that as investors demand enshittification, staying in those comfortable lock-ins will inevitably result in further pain down the road as the user is squeezed further and further with more invasive DRM restrictions, more features being locked behind paywalls, and intolerable subscriptions with ever increasing monthly dues.

At some point people will need to choose between continuing the use of lock-in software for continued comfort in the short term, or biting the bullet and developing/using the less comfortable FLOSS option to encourage it to become comfortable by dog-fooding it. We can see when that finally happens, it is able to out compete the lock-in options to the benefit of us all (Blender, Godot, and Krita are good examples).

But that's just my 2 cents.

[–] Canadian_Cabinet@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 weeks ago

This exact reason is why I've avoided Native Instruments / Kontact like the plague