this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
2 points (75.0% liked)

NZ Politics

820 readers
9 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!

This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi

This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick

Other kiwi communities here

 

Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm trying to figure out what the point of holding this session in a marae is, it doesn't sound like they were consulting with the public at all?

The cost for the venue was $2570, including venue hire and catering.

Don't they have their own building?

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Marae are very common hires for large groups - it's basically like hiring a hall, but with the additional benefit of subtly exposing people to Māori culture. As someone who has attended many marae functions, I stress how subtle it is. Most people don't even take their shoes off (and are not expected to). It's just like going to a hall.

They don't say how many people attended, but realistically $2.5k is couch cushion change for almost any council, and if there were enough people to hire a marae then that is likely to be a tiny amount of money per head compared to the cost of their time.

The weirdest part of this article in my view, is not that the council held a planning day at a marae, but that this guy opposes going because of his Christian faith. The thing is, Māori have historically been very Christian. Many of the common karakia are translations of bible prayers, and many customs have roots in Christianity. He doesn't oppose going to a marae because of his faith, he opposes it because he doesn't want it in another language.

It also doesn't sound like he wants religion out of government, he just wants to make sure it's in the original Christian language: modern New Zealand English.