this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
18 points (95.0% liked)

GrapheneOS

911 readers
32 users here now

An unofficial discussion community for anyone interested in GrapheneOS.

Helpful links:

Official Graphene OS Discussion Forum

List of official Matrix channels and other contact sources.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We've built our own text-to-speech system with an initial English language model we trained ourselves with fully open source data. It will be added to our App Store soon and then included in GrapheneOS as a default enabled TTS backend once some more improvements are made to it.

We're going to build our own speech-to-text implementation to go along with this too. We're starting with an English model for both but we can add other languages which have high quality training data available. English and Mandarin have by far the most training data available.

Existing implementations of text-to-speech and speech-to-text didn't meet our functionality or usability requirements. We want at least very high quality, low latency and robust implementations of both for English included in the OS. It will help make GrapheneOS more accessible.

Our full time developer working on this already built their own Transcribro app for on-device speech-to-text available in the Accrescent app store. For GrapheneOS itself, we want actual open source implementations of these features rather than OpenAI's phony open source though.

Whisper is actually closed source. Open weights is another way of saying permissively licensed closed source. Our implementation of both text-to-speech and speech-to-text will be actual open source which means people can actually fork it and add/change/remove training data, etc.

all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hominine@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

For my part, SherpaTTS has allowed me to have GLADOS in my ear when need be.

[–] lessthanluigi 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Same, dude!

[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

We have alternatives that work fine - RHVoice and Futo for text-to-speech and speech-to-text, respectively. What I would like to see is usability improvements for a Vanadium browser such as bookmark import./export, ~~and an adblocker~~.

[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 3 points 18 hours ago

Or just add-on for any chrome based mobile browser.

I'm always happy when open source Devs build new features (makes me assume they have passions they're pursuing), so glad theyre sharing their work all the same.

[–] Zangoose@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Vanadium already has an ad blocker though?

[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

I had my doubts until a few minutes ago when I got a demand to whitelist a site. I see ads all the time while using Vanadium. An adblocker where the user has no control is worthless. The ~~and~~ same site visited with Brave didn't trigger their adblock detection.

[–] Zangoose@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Fair enough. For me it gets most of the popup and in-page ads that would display on top of articles. I don't think it gets past paywalls but honestly I try not to read from paywalled sites anyway. Improving it to be more advanced would be nice though since I think right now it's just a simple toggle in settings.