this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2026
235 points (99.6% liked)

The Trump-Epstein Files™

1110 readers
548 users here now

We keep track of the release of the files, but also to explore what’s already available, and why – with enough exposure – this could bring the man down, and who knows even his regime or the empire.

Want to start digging yourself? Check out our sticky post

Our Rules

(Subject to Change)

Our Justice System

This community is run by volunteers so please don't test the justice system, as with all justice systems it is critically underfunded.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

EFTA00013180 is a press release draft on the death of Epstein but is dated as August 9th. Epstein died August 10th. Cannot be a typo as the draft also states Friday (August 10th 2019 was a Saturday)

Post on reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Epstein/comments/1qyy8vl/trump_administration_press_release_a_day_before/

Link to file: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00013180.pdf

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CaZrAl9O15@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

Key difference which seems that the draft was indeed made before his actual death is the serial.

The 19-XXX place holder in the drafts with the 9th as date, show that the draft was prepared the day of the 9th, and then reprinted the day after now with the official release number.

Why does this appear so many times in the files? Why would a draft have even been printed (twice)? Why all the haphazard redactions of the FBI staff names?

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

@OP thanks and welcome. Can you link to the original file on the DOJ site instead of Reddit please?

[–] kungfuratte@feddit.org 27 points 1 month ago

Depending on how those documents are generated it can still be a typo. Eg if you are just selecting a date and the day of the week is filled in automatically.

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

This reminds me of this card https://lemmy.world/post/40605849

which reminds me of this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvlsFgUqIY0

Warning, this is a several hour long rabbit hole (which has an important stop here: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bill-barr-jeffrey-epstein-book/)

TLDR; The relationship between AG Bill Barr under Trump I and Epstein is significant, and this new file adds to the pile that Epstein's death was premeditated.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago
[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If not for people meeting him on 9th (?), I could've thought they botched it all that bad they convinced everyone to wair another day to stage and clean up everything :D

But oh well, it's not impossible the first and rushed document of that day could've got the yesterday date initially, especially if they use a smart template or some plugin, external software to generate these with autofill of day of the week. That's how reports were generated at many places I worked for.

Like everything in this investigation, it got vacuumed with many initial drafts (and that's great), but I don't suspect it is a part of a conspiracy, but rather a sign of how incompetent and unprepared everyone was. I doubt that whatever clerk prepared these papers was in the circle of co-conspirators. That's more likely they've skipped their morning coffee to post it as early as possible, urged by their boss.

There is no date in the body of a document, only 'Earlier this morning', so the part they actually put up on the spot doesn't have any evidence towards or against suspicion, it's all in the header one rarely ever touches.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, unless it's impossible to choose yesterday's date in that software (which I doubt) then this is a load of nothing.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

There's a lot to look at in this post, and it is highly intriguing. But before I do then I'd there any way this can be forged, etc? I don't want to follow all these articles just to get to the end and find out it was just a day or date error...

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago

If it was forged it was forged by someone with access to files before they were released. Could be the government, a spy, a hacker. Heck, since the president is an inside man, this whole collection could be done over in the same way they did Hunter Biden's laptop.

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

No, looks genuine, see other comments