Wait until people discover how light bulbs are Mass Surveillance System
this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
86 points (100.0% liked)
Privacy
8789 readers
259 users here now
A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy
Rules:
- Be civil
- No spam posting
- Keep posts on-topic
- No trolling
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Plot twist: it has been for decades already...
Louis Rossman talked about this potential in consumer routers via ISP data collection a few months ago. I mean, there are feasible measures to disrupt the accuracy of this surveillance method in the same way there is for any. But, even if the new standard implements protections against use cases of human surveillance, there's no real way to prevent authoritarian states from applying the technology illegally or otherwise. Doesn't help that corporations with a vested interest in both data collection and compliance with authoritarian states also have tremendous influence on the kind of people who are in the IEEE.
I'm tellin ya, people have to bully STEM majors who cooperate like they should ICE agents who (enthusiastically) cooperate.
Yeah we really need to socially shun people willing to work for these companies. If you tell me you work for flock or amazon or google or meta you will just get an "eww" from me.
I knew someone who voluntarily went to work for Facebook a few years ago. I don't talk to them anymore. Last I heard from a mutual is that they got laid off, and it couldn't have happened to a more deserving schmuck.
I have someone in my extended family that also does. They are a special kind of weird people. The ultimate bootlickers.
Yeah I've had interactions like that as well. Another issue is a lot of this work is done through contracts with third-party developers too. I've met people who could say the name of the company they work for and you'd have to dig to find out they develop software for US military tank systems, so it is also easy for them to obscure their work if they understand people will challenge their participation in it.
I made the same mistake (of not realizing) a few years ago. But when i found out i quit as soon as i got some certification that got me started elsewhere.
As someone who lives in Silicon Valley (and is currently pursuing an EE degree), you either work for those companies, the military-industrial complex, or a startup about to be acquired by the tech giants, otherwise you are left behind economically and are unable to own a home or live without debt acquisition.
I'm still in college, I really don't like the idea of working for these places, but it may not be much of a choice once I graduate. At least if I want to live where I grew up and make full use of my engineering degree.
Then don't. Build a syndicate with college peers. Heck, found one as a Master’s program.
Maybe the place you live is shit then?
We don't need you. Hell, you don't even need yourself.
You're literally working towards a future where machines replace humans.
Thanks for your help fucking up the cause of humans being humans.
Hey, buddy? Fuck you and your economic goals. There is a very real choice here between being part of the problem and part of the solution. I can't make it for you, but would really like to disabuse you of the notion there's "not much of a choice". Build a comfortable life at the rest of the world's expense, sacrifice your opportunities for our collective wellbeing, self-immolate in protest, whatever you choose it's an impactful decision and you're the one making it. Good luck! Have fun! You matter, and selling the rest of us out is a dick move.
You mean it's not? Like the reason why Supermarkets have free wifi is to basically track customers to see where they go in the shop.
New routers are coming out that can watch and track humans and other figures based on the reflection of the waves coming back to them.
Like a fine detailed radar of the inside of your house.
Well fuck
- Its scary this technology even exists at all.
- Its scarier to think they've been developing and testing this already.
- What's even scarier, is realizing they probably already have recorded WiFi/XRay (whatever you wanna call it) porno videos as part of their tests...
I was told that when you see a technology become public, you should assume the US government has been using it for at least a decade, which is also scary.
This isn't new btw.
Will* become.
Could this work?
From reading the article, not to my understanding. This technology uses the way radio waves, in this case wifi, are bouncing around a space in order to build a picture of the people in it. These clothes just block the signals from devices underneath them. As far as I know, the shape of the garment (and therefore you) would still look the same, and then whatever recognition, gait analysis, etc would still work.
Maybe
I was always told to keep my wifi, nfc and bluetooth off.
I have messed with the chasing your tail doohickey. Given a bunch of money, I don't see why it's not plausible.
From the readme, it looks like chase your tail has a different focus than the article, which is focused on how your physical body perturbs the wifi signal, rather than probes against the wifi on your device.
Soooo, you can make a device that records radio waves like a camera records light, sort of. So having these devices out in public is basically the same as having surveillance cameras. With slightly different features of course.
So, how is this any different to having CCTV? Or not being allowed to have CCTV? Whichever applies to your country/area.
You can’t browse piefed using cctv.
Well not with that attitude.
I just mean that surveillance via wifi is so much more pernicious because wifi is useful. There is no use for cctv other than surveillance, so it would be relatively much easier to get rid of than wifi surveillance, and we haven’t even been able to get rid of that.
I know, I was just giving comedy a try.
Yes, WiFi emitting devices are useful, and WiFi using devices are useful, but what about WiFi recording and interpreting devices.