this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
57 points (96.7% liked)

World News

39826 readers
532 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] supamanc@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't know that advertising the existence of this team, or their methods, is a good idea.

[–] MolochHorridus@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Again, fuck Meta/Facebook for not helping.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 weeks ago

The fact they'll eagerly help oppress people, but not one of the few times the authorities are doing something decent, tells you everything you need to know.

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

I mean, I can see a case for not wanting to play dragnet at a mere request. You don't want any random guy and/or agency to be able to have you to help them track down someone they only have a picture of, no matter how much they pinkie swear they're doing it to protect that person.

That's getting awfully close to sharing PII. You generally want to see a subpoena for this stuff and with good reason. Meta are, oddly enough, not being actively scummy here. (One can of course argue about all the other times when they don't give a shit; the bigger picture is definitely super scummy. But for this in isolation they actually have a valid reason for their behavior.)

What might work would be a standardized, streamlined process where the police can ask the company and if the company says the request is reasonable they can apply for an expedited subpoena to allow legal access to the information. Agreement by both would be necessary to give more opportunities for due diligence. This process would also have to have a very limited scope in order to make abuse harder.

[–] jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Great argument, except Meta and several other companies have willingly shared data with ICE to help with arrests.

But I agree, these things should be taken care of with a warrant (or similar) with a defined scope.

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, that's what I meant with the bigger picture. They have a valid reason to deny this request but they haven't denied other requests that they really should've.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 3 weeks ago

And genocide protesters.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Facebook shares that info for profit with no problem, why not do the same to actually help people?

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

They’d find an address in seconds if the wall had a Palestine flag on it.

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The mother's boyfriend is a registered sex offender and they didn't check him out before?

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They didn't even know who the kid was.

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

Ah, that makes sense then.