This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Talarico seems to have his shit together. That said, keep your religion the fuck outta government. It’s fine pointing out the religious hypocrisy and charlatans in politics, but opening the door to religion, even if the individual is agreeable, is a bad idea.
Are you suggesting only agnostics should govern?
Talarico said in the interview he wants the separation of church and state to return as the current blend diminishes both.
Wouldn’t that be something?
But that’s not what I said. I said keep your religion outta my government. I didn’t say you couldn’t have religion.
In the statement "keep your religion outta my government", the line between 'keep your religious beliefs from influencing governmental decision making' and 'people belonging to a religion should be restricted from participating in the running of government' is quite fine, which is why I asked.
I appreciate your answering.
Ok, I see your point. It is a fine line. But I’m trying to make the distinction here that Talarico’s popularity is in a large part because of his vocal religious take. I firmly believe in separating church and State, and just because I agree with what one “church” is saying doesn’t mean we should invite the devil in the door yet again.
While my personal belief is that relgions should be abolished and I would much prefer no relgious individuals ran for government positions trying to ban someone off of thier beliefs like that with how prevelant relgion is today would just be setting bad precedent that could be turned against a population when you have people like the pedo in chief out governing the world. I will say any devout relgious person running would have me question how unbiased they could be as truly believing in fairtales and myths just already shows a severe deficiency in critical thinking skills.
With that being said I would still vote a sock into office over the domestic terrorist group that is the republican party. Perfect is the enemy of good so if this indivual at least truly believes in separation of church and state I am not going to dwell on their cognitive dissonance regarding religion as it seems to be helping keep them objective and move us in the right direction again.
You're really sleeping on the comma. They might seem unnecessary, but they are not.
Did you listen to his interview?
He states that his belief is that the separation of Church and State should 100% be protected. Not just to protect the government but to protect the religion, so it doesn't get taken advantage of by political movement like Christian Nationalists.
He mainly pushed love God and love your neighbor. If you loved your neighbor, then you wouldn't push your religion or any other belief on them.
I'm paraphrasing but that's what I got out of it. I think he's someone that could break through to some of the religious right.
I have listened to several of his interviews. That’s why I even bother to indicate I appreciate his take. Pardon me if I treat someone with skepticism riding heavily on a platform that is at minimum rehotorically religious stating they believe in separation of church and State.
Fair point to treat candidates with skepticism. Especially now.
I'm torn on this - Christianity (particularly evangelical christianity) has had an extremely negative effect on democracy in our country and has caused physical harm to others.
However, I think most people with a conscience subscribe to some form of philosophy or religion (even if atheists aren't "loyal" to any particular perspective and may not even use titles/categories to describe their value system) and I think it's fine for your morals/conscience to influence decision making. Even a purely scientific decision making process could be considered a form of philosophy.
That being said, most organized religion is about obedience to the tenets of said religion, not a method of asking questions about the world to try to find the most just way to proceed.
The US has been ChristoFascist for decades, banning stem cell research, stopping vaccines, every President has to attend some bullshit church, even the pedophiles.
Meanwhile fucking ROGER STONE is still breathing and has a soapbox.
It's subservience, not fear on CBS's part.
Good on Colbert for bringing a little Streisand effect to the party.
It's subservience because of fear.
The only fear for Ellison and Weiss is decent people ending their genocide.
I though Colbert was cancelled from the first of this year?
I think he's cancelled in May or thereabouts. It's a very slow cancellation.
It's not subservience. CBS is literally run by zio wackos. They're steering the genocidal bus. This is their show.
Subservience to the FCC and the administration is the excuse. The real reason is that David Ellison is afraid the dem might win.
The majority owner of CBS is Paramount Global, which itself is controlled by Skydance Media, a company led by David Ellison (son of Larry Ellison), following a significant acquisition of the Redstone family's stake in mid-2025.
Remember, CBS is now owned by a Trump ally.
Correct, they refused to air it not out of fear of the FCC, but out of fear of that Texans might like what Talarico has to say.
And it's a hell of a brave thing Colbert and crew are doing in speaking out.
They're patriots at a time when speech isn't free.
Remember, CBS is now owned by a ~~Trump ally~~ zionist.
Let's be real about where the loyalties lie.
You can still (and should) watch it on YouTube!
Rep. James Talarico On Confronting Christian Nationalism, And Strange Days In The Texas Legislature
Edit: If you feel so inclined, you can donate to his US Senate campaign here: https://secure.actblue.com/donate/jt-tx-web
That guy was super well spoken and had a good message. I'm surprised I hadn't heard of him before. Always nice to see the Streisand Effect in action!
He was definitely well spoken and definitely had a good message. It's not at all surprising that we haven't heard of him.
Talarico is vying for the Senate Democratic nomination against U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Dallas.
Interesting. Crockett is one of the very few Dems willing if not just able to navigate through Republican tactics. What could Talarico offer?
Literally the only defining feature I've seen listed about him is that he's very Christian.
So yeah... Not a big fan of that.
Not for you perhaps, but for a lot of people that's important. There are way too many people who falsely think the Republicans are the Christian party, and that's unfortunately helped by Christians who separate their faith from politics. It's vital that more Christians speak out about the hypocrisy and perversion of the "Religious Right", or uninformed people will continue to be led astray by them.
It's not good for you either if they continue to vote Republican, so give him this opportunity to set them straight.
Talerico. Brings his sincerity, faith, and working class background in in one of the poorest school districts in the country. He has integrity and and a way of invoking Christianity that I think resonates in Texas. He appeals to a broad swath of voters without compromising his progressive ideals.
I would vote for Crocket if she wasn't up against Talerico. But as is, I think he has a better shot at the general and I trust him more.
Colbert is a religious wacko so they're probably great homies.
Talarico resonates with the deeply Christian left
This stunt has caused the video to get 100 times the views it would normally get. I watched it and i never catch the colbert report unless i stumble across is online.
The Trump administration is doing their best to destroy this country, but even republicans know you don't touch the first amendment.
Banning something is a sure fire way to give it oxygen. Streisand effect
The problem Trump has in doing this type of suppression is that it gains more attention and riles people up more than if he had let the interview air. Sure the interview might have said things he didn't want to be said, but now he has made this a much bigger issue and he looks weak because he is scared at the mere prospect of some words being uttered.
i wouldn't have watched the interview if cbs hadn't cancelled it
Same
And, in hindsight, I'm glad I did. That guy has the right idea.
He said 'It's not left vs right, it's top vs bottom'.
Exactly what we need our politicians to be acknowledging
Yep, and Colbert has no reason to pull any punches either. They already canceled his show to appease the administration. Why would Stephen hesitate to tell the world every time CBS bends the knee?
Good on him for calling out every time they act as state propaganda and not a news network.
Talarivo and Crockett both seem like good candidates at first glance.
Neither should be censored.
Yesterday the Interview wasn't shown on the YouTube page. The search in the YouTube app Colbert talarico had zero aut suggestions and only showed the result after submitting. Oooof
Brilliant bit of marketing to blare "We've been censored by the FCC!" from the rooftops, on the day the Texas primary starts.
