Yeah, God's divine plan to destroy the US.
Global News
What is global news?
Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.
Post guidelines
Title format
Post title should mirror the news source title.
URL format
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefix
Country prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.
Rules
This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media posts
Avoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation. Any kind of discrimination is will not be tolerated.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
- !legalnews@lemmy.zip - International and local legal news.
- !technology@lemmy.zip - Technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
- !interestingshare@lemmy.zip - Fascinating articles, captivating images, satisfying videos, interesting projects, stunning research and more.
- !europe@lemmy.dbzer0.com - News and information about Europe.
- !usa@midwest.social - News and information about United States of America.
Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
Gods plan? A crusade? But Jerusalem is not in Iran...
skinnermeme.jpg
They "sent complaints"? They didn't refuse to fight due to the First Amendment violation?
They're complicit.
Technically they are slaves of the United States government and have no legal mechanism to say no even if the action is illegal.
If they refuse they will be court marshaled and jailed until the case is brought at the military court months later.
They absolutely do have legal mechanisms, you just described a facet of them. I get what you're saying, but my father was court marshaled twice and prevailed in both cases. Not that it's to be taken lightly, as I understand your point, it's true that it isn't some simple mechanism.
My point was that military personnel have no legal right to simply no because it might violate constitution. Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) is the only relevant document here and it gives government the final say in the outcome by design. Hence my use of terminology "slave".
Ya, not gonna split hairs on a poor use of the word slave here. But, otherwise I agree and stated so.
Fair. I do not want to diminish the meaning of word slave as those people had no choice. Military personnel while indirectly funneled into military service through economic and other factors are consenting participants.
Heard that, one hundred percent.
So then be jailed instead of murdering innocents? Seems prettty selfish of them.
I'm not justifying their actions. I'm just adding context that it's not as simple as saying "no".
Every single person who murders innocent civilians should face consequences. From cowards that issue these orders to slaves that execute them.
Military people are nut jobs.
Religious people are nutjobs.
Both people kill people in the name of the rich. Both people should be on the front lines without body armor.