this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
123 points (100.0% liked)

Global News

6281 readers
408 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation. Any kind of discrimination is will not be tolerated.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Religious freedom group says 200 troops sent complaints of superiors using extremist Christian rhetoric to justify war

Archived version: https://archive.is/20260303214805/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/03/us-israel-iran-war-christian-rhetoric


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, God's divine plan to destroy the US.

[–] Nalincah@feddit.org 3 points 18 minutes ago

Gods plan? A crusade? But Jerusalem is not in Iran...

[–] itsathursday@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

skinnermeme.jpg

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 10 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

They "sent complaints"? They didn't refuse to fight due to the First Amendment violation?

They're complicit.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 12 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

Technically they are slaves of the United States government and have no legal mechanism to say no even if the action is illegal.

If they refuse they will be court marshaled and jailed until the case is brought at the military court months later.

[–] slackassassin@piefed.social 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

They absolutely do have legal mechanisms, you just described a facet of them. I get what you're saying, but my father was court marshaled twice and prevailed in both cases. Not that it's to be taken lightly, as I understand your point, it's true that it isn't some simple mechanism.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

My point was that military personnel have no legal right to simply no because it might violate constitution. Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) is the only relevant document here and it gives government the final say in the outcome by design. Hence my use of terminology "slave".

[–] slackassassin@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Ya, not gonna split hairs on a poor use of the word slave here. But, otherwise I agree and stated so.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Fair. I do not want to diminish the meaning of word slave as those people had no choice. Military personnel while indirectly funneled into military service through economic and other factors are consenting participants.

[–] slackassassin@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago

Heard that, one hundred percent.

[–] Goretantath@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

So then be jailed instead of murdering innocents? Seems prettty selfish of them.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago

I'm not justifying their actions. I'm just adding context that it's not as simple as saying "no".

Every single person who murders innocent civilians should face consequences. From cowards that issue these orders to slaves that execute them.

[–] outofthisworld@lemmy.org 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Military people are nut jobs.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Religious people are nutjobs.

[–] outofthisworld@lemmy.org 2 points 3 hours ago

Both people kill people in the name of the rich. Both people should be on the front lines without body armor.