this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
136 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

4664 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the short term, this is not as dangerous as an outright ban on estrogen. If implemented and then combined with other methods of suppressing trans people, it might be far more destructive in the long term.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tharkys@lemmy.wtf 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sounds like a Republican accidentally had sex with a trans woman and is afraid all his friends will think he is gay.

An anti-trans person sucking a trans woman's gock

"Accidentally"

[–] Kayday@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

God damn I don't think I can take any more bad news today

[–] leggysnakegirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

YOU CAN LEAVE A COMMENT OPPOSING THIS ON THE FDA WEBSITE HERE : (https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/FDA-2025-P-7321-0001)

Currently most of the comments on there are from the groups proposing this. We can outnumber them.

[–] blaze@programming.dev 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Weird. It's gone now. The link is broken

There is also a link at the bottom of the article!

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm not LGBTQ+ but have multiple friends who are.

I"m just here to point out that if you are, you should look into getting armed and trained. It's a whole hell of a lot harder to oppress a group of people who are heavily armed.

[–] Rose@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago

Being armed didn't help Alex Pretti. I'd seriously consider leaving the country.

[–] TheGingerNut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 weeks ago

Cracks open a 1930s history book

Uh oh…