this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
48 points (100.0% liked)

World News

55101 readers
2190 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Researchers are calling for tighter regulation of AI-powered toys designed for toddlers, after conducting one of the first tests in the world to investigate how under-fives interact with the technology.

The study looked at how a small sample of children between the ages of three and five interacted with a cuddly toy called Gabbo.

A number of AI toys are already on the market for children aged as young as three but there is currently very little research into the impact of the tech on pre-schoolers.

The Cambridge University team found just seven relevant studies worldwide, none of which focused on the toddlers themselves.

Gabbo contains a voice-activated AI chatbot from OpenAI. It has been designed to encourage pre-schoolers to talk to it and carry out imaginative play.

Study - https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.126270

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Or we could simply not buy them for the children.? My daughter has carefully structured access to apps on her tablet and AI is strictly out. She sometimes models that her school friends have access to certain apps. However, she is at an age where she is still a little upset but can understand why we have these controls.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Or we could just ban the sales of AI-based toys altogether.

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

I certainly wholeheartedly agree. Please note I'm not the most experienced of parents and I only have one child.

[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago

My now near adult kids have actually understood and been thankful that their childhood was 'unfairly strict' on what they could do on their devices. They have friends who have had unmonitored access to anything on their devices and it starts to show badly enough that even their peers notice how short their attention span is and how twisted their view of the world has become.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Soon:

"I'm so sad, mommy wouldn't buy me more toys..."

AI Toy: "MURDER YOUR PARENTS 😈🔪"

You're absolutely right! Without your parents, nobody is feeding or nurturing you! I'll admit, this was a big miscalculation on my end. I dropped the ball and will make sure it doesn't happen in the future. Would you like me to help you research foster programs or give you tips on how to survive as a homeless youth?

[–] Teknikal@anarchist.nexus 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

My opinion is if you would have to be crazy to buy any of your kids an AI anything, I wouldn't be suprised if it told kids to drink bleach or something.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

How about 'should not exist'? If you're a parent and you let AI toys interact with your child, you're a moron and a threat to the world. Fuck you.

[–] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They named it Gabbo? That's a Simpson's reference. Most of the parents who would consider buying this are old enough to remember that episode.

[–] pwalshj@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

"All the kids in Springfield are SOB's."

[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Generative AI products in general need to be better regulated. With more and more consumers trusting the output of LLMs, companies can use them to collect more consumer data than ever before and infuse marketing and propaganda into LLM outputs with no distinction, to the detriment of the genuine sources of information upon which they depend.

[–] pwalshj@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Bluefruit@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Man I fucking love the wiki bear skit. So good.

"Imagine trying to breath but instead of air, your lungs feel with sweet molasses, yum yum!"

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe the parents should look up from their phones for half a damn minute and take care of their crotch goblins.