this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
167 points (99.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

30427 readers
2139 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 12 points 47 minutes ago

It's not often you see IPv5

[–] slampisko@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago

Sorry, that's my IP. I was trying something

[–] thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 hours ago

In addition to what others have already posted, I suspect that this might be an attempt to evade spam/phishing filters that are looking for an IP address with a specific regular expression. Having a fake IP address that doesn’t match the traditional ^((25\[0-5]|(2\[0-4]|1\d|\[1-9]|)\d)\\.?\b){4}$ format might let this message slip through.

[–] ttyybb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Your first mistake is sharing this email with everyone here

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 78 points 4 hours ago (5 children)

I often assume this kind of thing is part of an effort to filter for idiots

If you know that's an invalid IP address, you're probably less likely to fall for the scam after the scammer has put the setup work in. So if they filter you out before a scammer has to spend any actual effort on you, that means more time they can spend scamming people who might be more likely to fall for it

That's why these things often have egregious spelling errors and other seemingly obvious red flags

[–] zo0@programming.dev 16 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Just because I know what a valid IP is doesn't mean I'm not an idiot 😎

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 1 points 2 hours ago

That's not the probability they are looking for.

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 30 points 4 hours ago

I do believe that is confirmed canon.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It's possible in general, but I don't think that's what's going on specifically here; not many people read IP addresses in such detail to notice such things at first glance.

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It’s exactly what is happening, they’re filtering out people who know what an IP address is and can contain so that they get fewer time wasters.

[–] communism@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The point schnurrito was making is that even if you know what an IP address is and what are valid or invalid IP addresses, a lot of people won't read the IP address. They'll just see numbers and skim over them. Even if you're keeping eyes peeled for scams, most people don't have their IP address memorised off the top of their heads so they wouldn't be looking to check if the IP address looks right or not.

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

And the point I’m making is that they’re doing it to filter out people who know and pay attention. Real simple stuff.

[–] communism@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Then I don't think that would be the most effective way because most people aren't paying that much attention, independently of knowledge. What would tip me off to it being a scam would be other parts of the email.

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 46 minutes ago

You, maybe, someone else, maybe not.

They put in a lot of flags like that, of varying obviousness, to filter out as many people as possible who would be savvy enough to not fall for the scam overall. It’s not just one clue, it never is.

[–] teddypolice@feddit.org 11 points 4 hours ago

Movies and TV shows actually do it this way to prevent actual machines getting group hugged.

Like in that one X-Files episode, where the Lone Gunmen hack into an invalid IP.

[–] sniggleboots@europe.pub 6 points 4 hours ago

It's also why there's usually bad spelling or grammar in those e-mails as well

[–] First_Thunder@lemmy.zip 92 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

Oh yeah, that’s the new hexadecimal IPV8

[–] mergingapples@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Hello, I am apparently an idiot. What is wrong with that IP address that people can tell it's an immediate phishing scam?

[–] Turious@leaf.dance 16 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

IP addresses can't have segment numbers going over 255.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, IPv4 addresses use four bytes. Those four bytes are represented as four decimal numbers, separated by dots. And a byte can only represent the decimal values 0–255.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 41 points 5 hours ago
[–] dracs@programming.dev 18 points 5 hours ago

I think you mean IPV0x08

[–] ghodawalaaman@programming.dev 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

wait what? I feel like I am left behind in the tech. I only know about ipv4 and ipv6 😭😭😭

[–] tyler@programming.dev 38 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

They’re making a joke. The numbers in the IP are way too high for v4, but the format isn’t v6, so it’s a “new range” of v8.

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 4 points 4 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 16 minutes ago

In the drawer right next to IPv5

[–] teddypolice@feddit.org 6 points 4 hours ago

at 192.512.512.10.0/42.

[–] saltnotsugar@lemmy.world 20 points 5 hours ago

Jesus Christ, that’s Jason Bourne’s IP address!

[–] Bonsoir@lemmy.ca 11 points 5 hours ago

Please, do not share the button. It's gross.

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 hours ago

Probably outer space