this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
276 points (96.9% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

38907 readers
5050 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dumbass@piefed.social 18 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I'm in a weird position, I hate how car centric the world is and designed to be car first, but I also equally hate walking any distance that requires effort. So imma sit this one out.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 week ago

behold: busses and trains

[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Having well maintained public transport within 3 minutes of walking sounds way better than driving to me

[–] Emi@ani.social 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Now just to make it so it doesn't cost 25czk for single trip.

[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't you have annual passes? They tend to be a fair deal. Especially when you compare them to the cost of car mobility.

[–] Emi@ani.social 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, we do but past few years the prices went up quite a bit. Also I don't use it that often to make it worth buying full pass.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 week ago

It's infrastructure, it being "free" (in sense of immediate direct payment) is about as imperative as/is part of it being convenient.

[–] Bratosch@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Well, the car centricism isn't gonna go away without effort. But the 'walking effort' you hate is going to become more tolerable and maybe even enjoyable the more you do it. So, I guess one 'hate' is endless while the other is not?

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pedestrianized infrastructure tends to be denser since they don't need parking lots. It often requires more effort to get in your car and drive and park than just walking 100 feet in a place without cars.

China has rideshare bike parking basically on every street, and it costs like 2USD/mo so you can almost always just get on a random bike and use it to go even just 100 feet to get to the subway or bus entrance.

[–] feannag@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The problem with bike share is the helmet issue. I love my bike but I'm not going to carry a helmet everywhere I go on the off chance I might bike.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Some bike models have a helmet that sits in the basket, and is supposed to unlock with the bike. But the lock never works, and I asked a worker about it and he was like "don't worry about it".

I think it worked at one point, but nobody bothered to use the helmet because there's dedicated, usually separated, bike lanes almost everywhere. And then there's a giant sidewalk you can ride on if you want to go even slower.

Either that, or there's a separate option in the app to unlock the helmets that I wasn't seeing.

[–] feannag@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I like the idea, but if it doesn't work than it's not great. Plus sharing helmets can be I'll advised for health reasons.

I know there was a company in Europe that was working on a portable airbag style helmet. Hopefully something like that would make bike share more viable.

Even with dedicated lanes, bike accidents without helmets are more dangerous.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are bike accidents really dangerous when you're protected from cars and we're talking about single gear bikes that barely go 10 mph?

[–] feannag@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't know. I'm not sure if anyone has those stats specifically. I know that head injuries are the leading cause of cyclist deaths and un-helmeted riders are three times more likely to die from head injuries

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15389588.2024.2363476#abstract

This is data from Denmark, so a bike-centric country with good infrastructure. It still reports a significant decrease in traumatic brain injury for helmet use in a given crash.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

The question isn't do helmets reduce the risk of head injury, its "is that reduction worth the inconvenience given this situation", for example for most people, walking around their own home has a low enough risk of head injury that a helmet isn't worth it, while riding a motorcycle is, if you have anything to protect.

The total number of accidents and population in those cities helps. The fact that Denmark doesn't have a helmet law suggests to me that people are expected to have the judgement regarding the risk they're actually taking.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 week ago

Def better, but you know, that's still people, so eww.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

agreed. hitting cars with a car can end your fun prematurely.

hitting pedestrians with a car can make your fun last at least an hour.

1000003266