this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
52 points (94.8% liked)

news

809 readers
938 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bazell@lemmy.zip 38 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I haven't heard that the NATO alliance had ever approved this war in the first place.

[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Because they didn't. But the pedo Oompa-Loompa hade to be force to clean his own shit alone.

Ha thanks, now I want a video of a Oompa Loompa remix song about the Iran War.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Individually some bootlicker member politicians tried their best and made some very apaling (even for them) and mask off statements.

Like " international law doesn't apply to Iran"

[–] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If NATO wants to maintain any semblance of being a defensive alliance then I don’t see how they could possibly aid in a war of aggression.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

well the war on Libya was a war of aggression

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Good thing too. We don't need this to turn into Iraq 2.0.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Iraq couldn't fight back.
You can compare it to Vietnam should the clowns decide to send meatbags.

[–] sik0fewl@piefed.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Most of NATO said no to that, too.